• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ENDOWRIST; SYSTEM,SURGICAL,COMPUTER CONTROLLED INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ENDOWRIST; SYSTEM,SURGICAL,COMPUTER CONTROLLED INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 470298
Device Problems Failure to Fire (2610); Mechanical Jam (2983); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 08/24/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The surgeon was using the 45-degree xi robotic stapler and when he closed the stapler in preparation to fire the staple load, it threw an error code that said it was unable to fire.The surgeon opened and removed the stapler and reload, and the stapler was red tagged and removed from the field.He took a picture of what it looked like after he removed the staple reload without it successfully firing.A new stapler was opened to the field for use.From the procedural note: "left lung was taken off of the ventilatory circuit and the staple line was deployed.At this point, i was simply left with the superior aspect of the major fissure to complete.I chose a robotic power-assisted green load stapler.The stapler was positioned and deployed without any issue.I then fired the stapler and halfway through, received an error message that the stapler had jammed.I was able to release the stapler.As messaged, i identified the location of the blade within the staple.This was visualized and the entire stapler was removed out of the robotic port without incident.I examined this portion of the parenchyma in this heavy anthracotic lung.There were some staples that did not deploy, and these were manually removed.At this point, i obtained a power-assisted medtronic thick tissue black load 45mm stapler.This was positioned over and more proximally to the prior-placed staple line.This was clamped and deployed without any challenge.The stapler was removed.Utilizing 2 rolled gauzes for traction, i examined the area of the bronchial stump, which was intact.Just superior to this area with a double staple line that was placed over the failed staple line, i did see some air leak from the surrounding emphysematous parenchyma.The staple line itself was intact.This area was marked.All of the water was evacuated, and the left lung was taken off of the ventilatory circuit.Examination of this area demonstrated some weakening of the lung adjacent to the secondary staple line that was the cause of this air leak location.This could not be hand-tied or reinforced with bolstered stitches for concern over further tearing this lung.I elected to create a pleural tent and glue this onto the lung.The parietal pleura from the upper half of the chest was then mobilized with monopolar cautery.I kept the medial attachments intact for vascular supply.I mobilized this pleural tent wide and long enough to easily drape it over the area of the bronchial stump as well as at superior area of parenchymal air leak.After positioning this, one application of progel was placed on the lung and the pleural tent was glued down over this area.Positive pressure was held for 3 minutes.Following this, 2 additional applications of progel were placed at 3-minute intervals around the entire pleural tent and up superior segment of the lower lobe.After a final cure, the chest was filled with water and the lung was placed back in the circuit and charged up to 20cm.I did not appreciate any air leak.The lung was taken off of the ventilatory circuit and all the water was aspirated dry.At the completion of this operation, i could not appreciate any evidence of an air leak at 20cm of suction." there were no complications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOWRIST
Type of Device
SYSTEM,SURGICAL,COMPUTER CONTROLLED INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
1266 kifer road
sunnyvale CA 94086
MDR Report Key10641327
MDR Text Key210203364
Report Number10641327
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NAY
UDI-Device Identifier00886874112427
UDI-Public(01)00886874112427
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/30/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number470298
Device Catalogue Number470298
Device Lot NumberT10190211
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA09/30/2020
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer10/07/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/07/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age25915 DA
Patient Weight67
-
-