(b)(4).Device analysis: during the visual analysis, it was determined that the device had three beads with low bead separation force, two of which were depolarized.Based on the follow-up response, there were no records of patient going through an mri prior to explant procedure.However, the review of the manufacturing records indicate that the bead separation force test inspection results of the reported lot number 5279, and serial number (b)(4) were within specifications during production inspection.Therefore, the device investigation suggests that the device was likely damaged during use by being exposed to a static magnetic field (possibly at a different facility).Note that the reported device is mr unsafe per torax ifu.Overall review of the device function and dimensions, excepting the demagnetization/depolarization of several beads, show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.The dhr for lot# 5279, serial# (b)(4) was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: there is no record, or documentation of the patient having completed a mri prior to the explant.
|