Model Number ISOLINE 2CT6 |
Device Problems
Over-Sensing (1438); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Low impedance (2285)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/05/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The subject rv lead was implanted on (b)(6) 2010.In the follow up performed on (b)(6) 2020 no anomaly was identified.On (b)(6) 2020 an inappropriate shock occurred while the patient was cutting his toenail, the physician interrogated the device and confirmed this event.To avoid another inappropriate shock, vf zone continuous cycle was changed from 6 to 20 and the ventricular sensitivity was changed from 0.4mv to 0.8 mv.On (b)(6) 2020 another device check was performed.The ventricular impedance was below 200o while intermittent oversensing was found.Atrial sensitivity, both atrial and ventricular thresholds were normal.No new episode had been recorded since the latest check performed on the previous day.The patient was stable but was hospitalized in order to have inspection for the bloodstream of subclavian vein and superior vena cava.A re-intervention to add a new lead is scheduled on (b)(6) 2020.
|
|
Event Description
|
The subject rv lead was implanted on (b)(6) 2010.In the follow up performed on (b)(6) 2020 no anomaly was identified.On (b)(6) 2020 an inappropriate shock occurred while the patient was cutting his toenail, the physician interrogated the device and confirmed this event.To avoid another inappropriate shock, vf zone continuous cycle was changed from 6 to 20 and the ventricular sensitivity was changed from 0.4mv to 0.8 mv.On (b)(6) 2020 another device check was performed.The ventricular impedance was below 200o while intermittent oversensing was found.Atrial sensitivity, both atrial and ventricular thresholds were normal.No new episode had been recorded since the latest check performed on the previous day.The patient was stable but was hospitalized in order to have inspection for the bloodstream of subclavian vein and superior vena cava.On (b)(6) 2020, a re-intervention was performed.The subject lead was abandoned in the patient's body and another lead was implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
B5 updated.
|
|
Event Description
|
The subject rv lead was implanted on (b)(6) 2010.In the follow up performed on (b)(6) 2020 no anomaly was identified.On (b)(6) 2020 an inappropriate shock occurred while the patient was cutting his toenail, the physician interrogated the device and confirmed this event.To avoid another inappropriate shock, vf zone continuous cycle was changed from 6 to 20 and the ventricular sensitivity was changed from 0.4mv to 0.8 mv.On (b)(6) 2020 another device check was performed.The ventricular impedance was below 2000 while intermittent oversensing was found.Atrial sensitivity, both atrial and ventricular thresholds were normal.No new episode had been recorded since the latest check performed on the previous day.The patient was stable but was hospitalized in order to have inspection for the bloodstream of subclavian vein and superior vena cava.On (b)(6) 2020 a re-intervention was performed.The subject lead was abandoned in the patient's body and another lead was implanted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Please refer to the attached analysis report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|