H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and lot history review, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), labeling, and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a detached suture wing is confirmed; however, the exact cause is unknown.One photograph of a dressed dialysis catheter was returned for evaluation.An initial visual observation of the photograph showed a guardiva device, an attachable suture wing, and an inserted catheter underneath a clear dressing.The guardiva device and the attachable suture wing were observed to not be attached to the catheter.Suture material could be seen on the wings of the attachable suture wing, but no suturing material could be seen on the suture grooves of the attachable suture wing.While the exact cause of the detached suture wing could not be determined from the returned photograph, possible causes include improper securement of the attachable suture wing, material fatigue, and sharp instrument damage.As a note, the product ifu states: ¿secure the wing onto the catheter by tying sutures around the wing using the suture grooves.¿ h3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|