Arjo was informed about a malfunction of a parker bath.During a service visit requested by the customer for another issue (a leaking tub drain), an arjo technician noticed that parker door bath was not staying up and was falling down fast.Following the arjo technician¿s statement, no visible damage of a gas strut was noticed.Based on the collected information the device might have been in use in this condition and the customer did not inform arjo about the issue before visit.No injury or health consequences were reported.The faulty parts (tub drain, two jets and door strut) were replaced.Before the bath was released for further use, it was tested and confirmed as operated correctly.The claimed bathtub was not under arjo maintenance and service contract.It is unknown how long the part which failed was used.The operating and product care instructions (opci; 04.Al.00) informs the device user that door gas strut is subjected to wear and should be replaced every 3rd year.It also provides warnings and actions that can be carried out to prevent situation reported from occurring: ¿always ensure that the equipment is handled by trained staff.¿ ¿always ensure that the bathers limbs are clear of the door before closing.¿ ¿always keep fingers clear of the door when closing.¿ the claimed unit was manufactured about 14 years before this malfunction occurred.As per the operating and product care instructions: ¿the normal useful life of this equipment, unless otherwise stated, is ten (10) years, subject to required preventative maintenance as specified in this manual.¿ in summary, the device was not up to the manufacturer¿s specification due to faulty door part, which was noticed upon the service of the device.This complaint was decided to be reported to the competent authorities in abundance of caution due to gas strut malfunction leading to bath¿s door falling and because the device was most probably not removed from service, but used in this condition.
|