Model Number 491346 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 09/26/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Common device name: processor, cervical cytology slide, automated.Medical device expiration date: na.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using the bd totalys¿ slideprep instrument patient samples from a batch became misassociated.This incident occurred on (b)(6) 2019 and the customer informed bd on (b)(6) 2020.In (b)(6) 2020, it was discovered that a mix up had taken place in a batch (16 samples).The original surepath vials are marked with the correct social security number, but the material on the glasses in at least 2 cases is mixed up within the batch.This misassociation led to two patients being misdiagnosed with confusion between "suspected squamous cell carcinoma" and "low-grade squamous cell carcinoma".Until the mix-up was discovered, the continued care of the patients was based on the wrong diagnoses.Between "suspected squamous cell carcinoma" and "low-grade squamous cell carcinoma".Until the mix-up was discovered, the continued care of the patients were based on the wrong diagnoses.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while using the bd totalys¿ slideprep instrument patient samples from a batch became disassociated.This incident occurred on (b)(6) 2019 and the customer informed bd on (b)(6) 2020.In (b)(6) 2020, it was discovered that a mix up had taken place in a batch (16 samples).The original surepath vials are marked with the correct social security number, but the material on the glasses in at least 2 cases is mixed up within the batch.This disassociation led to two patients being misdiagnosed with confusion between "suspected squamous cell carcinoma" and "low-grade squamous cell carcinoma".Until the mix-up was discovered, the continued care of the patients was based on the wrong diagnoses.Between "suspected squamous cell carcinoma" and "low-grade squamous cell carcinoma".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6: investigation summary complaint alleges mis-association of specimen sample on the slideprep instrument serial number (b)(6).The sample mismatch issue was due to operator error when scanning the consumables or placing them in the tray in the multiprocessor or associated slides on the slideprep instrument.Customer notes "it is not possible to investigate if labels have been placed on the wrong vial since the original vials and tubes were discarded already".The customer was unable to reproduce the issue and speculated it was due to workflow error as new staff that has not been trained by bd experts are using the devices.This complaint is not a confirmed failure of the instrument.Root cause is attributed to operator error.The instrument is behaving as intended.Device history record (dhr) review is not necessary as this complaint is unconfirmed and the cause identified.Returned samples are not required for this investigation.Immediate correction was to discuss proper processing with the customer.This was a single and accidental incident.Formal corrective action is not needed.Bd quality will continue to closely monitor trends associated with failure of ¿chain of custody¿.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|