• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBLEM S-ICD; IMPLANTABLE LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBLEM S-ICD; IMPLANTABLE LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 3501
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Fracture (1260); Over-Sensing (1438); Failure to Sense (1559); Under-Sensing (1661); Connection Problem (2900); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems Twiddlers Syndrome (2114); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/29/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been received for analysis.This report will be updated upon completion of analysis.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a clinician contacted boston scientific technical services (ts) for review a presenting electrogram.Ts noted possible telemetry drop out and discussed concern over possible sternal wires, under insertion, sharp bends or conductor damage.The field representative saw the patient the following day and noted that the patient's history show no indication of sternal wires.During an in office interrogation prior to having a chest x-ray noise was observed when the patient moved in his chair.There was no noise in the secondary vector but noise was seen in both primary and alternate vectors.The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (s-icd) was reprogrammed to secondary sensing vector.Review of the x-rays found the s-icd was in a different orientation and the electrode was tangled and kinked.Ts reviewed the x-rays and further noted there appeared to be either twiddling or migration of the s-icd via movement.Ts also observed a sharp bend in the electrode when viewing the lateral film.It was discussed that labeling states to avoid sharp bends in the electrode.Ts recommended a revision procedure to assess the system as the electrode could have conductor damage or there could be insertion issues which could lead to compromised therapy.A revision procedure was performed a couple months later due to concerns over under insertion, twiddler's syndrome and conductor damage.The s-icd and electrode were explanted and a single change transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) and right ventricular (rv) lead were implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed to submit the analysis results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this electrode was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Resistance testing confirmed the electrode was fractured and visual examination determined the fracture was located just distal to the terminal pin.There was a slight twist in the electrode just distal to the terminal pin and surface abrasion above the fracture site.The field allegations of oversensing and noise were confirmed.Based on the analysis results, the fracture appears to be the result of cyclic fatigue at the fracture site.Patient code 3191 captures the reportable event of surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBLEM S-ICD
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
MDR Report Key10714238
MDR Text Key212388003
Report Number2124215-2020-21076
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00802526599200
UDI-Public00802526599200
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P110042/S077
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/10/2020
Device Model Number3501
Device Catalogue Number3501
Device Lot Number119586
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/07/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/30/2020
Initial Date FDA Received10/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/19/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/16/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-