|
Model Number 86700 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 10/07/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Attempts to obtain patient information for identifier, age, weight, ethnicity and race have been unsuccessful to date.Attempts to obtain the patient information were made via email.All reasonably known patient information is included in this report.The implant or explant dates are not applicable to this device.Not applicable for this device.Device was not returned for analysis.Do not apply to this submission.The instructions for use (ifu) cautions: do not advance the guide wire against significant resistance.If binding occurs between the catheter and the guide wire while inside the patient, carefully remove both the wire and catheter and do not use.The catheter should never be forcibly inserted into lumens narrower than the catheter body or forced through a tight stenosis.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during a diagnostic peripheral procedure when pulling back the manufacturers device the tip of the device broke off in the patient.Attempts to retrieve were unsuccessful, a stent was placed in the brachiocephalic arch.This adverse event is being submitted because the tip of the manufacture¿s wire separated in the patient and additional medical intervention was required to stent the separated portion of the device in situ.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Blocks a2-a5: all reasonably known patient information is included in this report.Block h3: the device was visually and microscopically inspected, damage was observed.The scanner body and floppy tip were missing from the catheter shaft.The distal end of the esl (expanded single lumen) had rough edges and portions were missing with the detached scanner body.A small portion of inner member material was also missing with the detached scanner body.The microcables were severed and visible as a result of the torn esl.The inner member was torn.The probable cause of the reported tip separation is damage in use, likely from an excessive pulling force, as evidenced by the observed stretched and twisted distal end of the damaged catheter shaft.Submission of this report does not, in itself, represent a conclusion by the manufacturer and/or authorized representative or the national competent authority that the content of this report is complete or accurate, that the medical device(s) listed failed in any manner and/or that the medical device(s) caused or contributed to the alleged death or deterioration in the state of the health of any person.
|
|
Event Description
|
This follow-up supplemental report #1 is being submitted to advise pertinent device analysis findings and additional information received.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|