Model Number 101-9812 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problems
Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 10/02/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: product family: superion implant, upn: (b)(4), model: 101-9810, serial: n/a, batch: 700060.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the vertiflex implant procedure for the lumbar 3 and 4 the procedure had to be aborted.During the attempt to implant of a 12 inch spacer it broke, another attempt to implant was made with a 10 inch spacer which broke as well.It was then decided to abort the procedure.It was noted that the spinous processes was tight and there was resistant space.It is believed that the spinous processes were very thick and that poor patient positioning also contributed to the difficulty of the implant.It was noted that appropriate force was used during the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
101-9812; 700084: it was reported that the 12mm implant broke under much stress.The spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The damage to implant indicates failure was due to a combination of deployment against resistance, such as bone, and physician failing to correctly attach the inserter to the spacer.The probable cause is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.101-9810; 700060: it was report that the 10 inch implant broke.The spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The damage to implant indicates failure was likely due to a combination of deployment against resistance, such as bone, and physician failing to correctly attach the inserter to the spacer.The probable cause is unintended use error caused or contributed to event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the vertiflex implant procedure for the lumbar 3 and 4 the procedure had to be aborted.During the attempt to implant of a 12 inch spacer it broke, another attempt to implant was made with a 10 inch spacer which broke as well.It was then decided to abort the procedure.It was noted that the spinous processes was tight and there was resistant space.It is believed that the spinous processes were very thick and that poor patient positioning also contributed to the difficulty of the implant.It was noted that appropriate force was used during the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the vertiflex implant procedure for the lumbar 3 and 4 the procedure had to be aborted.During the attempt to implant of a 12 inch spacer it broke, another attempt to implant was made with a 10 inch spacer which broke as well.It was then decided to abort the procedure.It was noted that the spinous processes was tight and there was resistant space.It is believed that the spinous processes were very thick and that poor patient positioning also contributed to the difficulty of the implant.It was noted that appropriate force was used during the procedure.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|