Dhr review and review of complaint history did not identify any contributory factors to the event.A full analysis of the data logs has been performed.This analysis concluded that a collision occurred between the cannula holder and the patient reference.The patient was not injured or affected due to the collision.A review of the ifu has also been performed and the user manual indicates how to avoid robot arm collisions.Therefore, based on the investigation performed, the technical root cause of the event was determined to be use error mismanagement of the vigilance device.(b)(4).
|
After completion of registration and intraoperative image acquisition for the rosa spine robot, the surgeon planned his screw trajectories.Once planning was completed, the clinical representative (cr) drove to the first screw.The surgeon was looking away from the robot while on the pedal.The cr was trying to watch the arm movement as well so that it did not run into the patient reference, but the instrument holder ended up colliding with the patient reference.Due to the collision, the patient reference did loosen from the psis pin.Because of this the cr informed the surgeon that another intraoperative scan would have to be performed.The surgeon decided to abort the case using rosa and decided to place the pedicle screws in the traditional technique.The patient was not injured or effected due to the collision.
|