• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC17
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 10/09/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pc (b)(4).Additional information was requested, and the following was received: on what date did the implant take place? (b)(6) 2020 does the patient have any of the allergies to metals? no if so, what test have been done to test for metal allergies.Is the patient currently taking currently taking steroids / immunization drugs? no did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? i do not know, i will ask the surgeon.Was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? yes was mesh used at time of implant? no what was the reason for removal of the linx device? the stomach had herniated through the linx device and there was a massive recurrent paraesophageal hernia at the time of removal, was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? no have the symptoms resolved since the device was explanted? i do not know because the linx was not found in the original position, described the position of the linx device at the time of removal.It appeared as though the linx was partially adhered to the diaphragm (anterior) and had stomach herniated through the device.Did the patient have a hiatal hernia at the time of the removal? yes, a paraesophageal hernia was present at the time of removal.Did it appear that the position of the device had changed since the implant procedure? how was this change observed (intra-operatively at the time of explant, x-rays, barium swallow, egd)? in the additional information it is stated: ¿the stomach had herniated through the linx device and there was a massive recurrent paraesophageal hernia¿.Does this mean the device had eroded into the stomach? no, there was no erosion.Instead it appeared to look like it migrated to the stomach.Did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? you quoted.Please reply when you have the answer.I have not heard back from the surgeon yet.Have the symptoms resolved since the device was explanted? i have not heard back from the surgeon yet.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be field as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the linx is being removed.The case is being completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/16/2020.Device analysis: overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.The dhr for lot: 24787 was reviewed.No ncs, defects, or reworks related to the product complaint were found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key10763025
MDR Text Key213900900
Report Number3008766073-2020-00166
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005370
UDI-Public00855106005370
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/26/2023
Device Model NumberLXMC17
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC17
Device Lot Number24787
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/30/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/09/2020
Initial Date FDA Received10/30/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/30/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/16/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
-
-