• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CRITIKON DE MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE C.V. APEXPRO FH; MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT (WIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CRITIKON DE MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE C.V. APEXPRO FH; MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT (WIT Back to Search Results
Model Number 2025064-004
Device Problems Defective Alarm (1014); Alarm Not Visible (1022)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Cardiopulmonary Arrest (1765)
Event Date 09/17/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi not required legal manufacturer: (b)(4).Ge healthcare's investigation is on-going at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
Per medwatch report (b)(4): the patient was off telemetry and it was reported that no alarms were provided.The patient coded while being off telemetry.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per medwatch report (b)(4), it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 at around 17:22 a patient being monitored on the apexpro fh telemetry system coded and no alarms were provided.After the event, the attending doctor determined telemetry monitoring was lost approx.40 min.Prior to the event, however, the nursing staff stated they were not aware as they did not observe any alarms.The report also stated that during testing following the event, the telemetry transmitter exhibited issues with intermittent function but that the networked central station asserted a no telem alarm as expected and in accordance with product specifications.Ge healthcare (gehc) attempted to contact the customer's biomedical engineer and risk manager on multiple occasions.The biomed eng responded once but could not provide any further details regarding the patient's status.The customer did not reply to gehc requests for access to test the telemetry system's alarm function or download log files for gehc engineering analysis.As part of a service request and prior to gehc receiving the medwatch report, gehc depot repair received the affected telemetry transmitter and noted that the bulkhead and battery contacts were corroded.The transmitter was also missing the battery door and serial port plug.The necessary service was performed on the device and it was returned to the customer.Due to the limited information available, gehc was unable to determine the root cause for the alleged missed no telem alarm, however, lack of clinical staff awareness of the no telem alarm at the central station may be a possible cause.Gehc did not identify any adverse trend related to no telem alarm.H3 other text : per medwatch report (b)(4), it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 at around 17:22 a patient being monitored on the apexpro fh telemetry system coded and no alarms were provided.After the event, the attending doctor determined telemetry monitoring was lost approx.40 min.Prior to the event, however, the nursing staff stated they were not aware as they did not observe any alarms.The report also stated that during testing following the event, the telemetry transmitter exhibited issues with intermittent function but that the networked central station asserted a no telem alarm as expected and in accordance with product specifications.Ge healthcare (gehc) attempted to contact the customer's biomedical engineer and risk manager on multiple occasions.The biomed eng responded once but could not provide any further details regarding the patient's status.The customer did not reply to gehc requests for access to test the telemetry system's alarm function or download log files for gehc engineering analysis.As part of a service request and prior to gehc receiving the medwatch report, gehc depot repair received the affected telemetry transmitter and noted that the bulkhead and battery contacts were corroded.The transmitter was also missing the battery door and serial port plug.The necessary service was performed on the device and it was returned to the customer.Due to the limited information available, gehc was unable to determine the root cause for the alleged missed no telem alarm, however, lack of clinical staff awareness of the no telem alarm at the central station may be a possible cause.Gehc did not identify any adverse trend related to no telem alarm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APEXPRO FH
Type of Device
MONITOR, PHYSIOLOGICAL, PATIENT (WIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CRITIKON DE MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
calle valle del cedro 1551
juarez 32575
MX  32575
MDR Report Key10772086
MDR Text Key214304503
Report Number3008729547-2020-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K033365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number2025064-004
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/05/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/02/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/14/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/16/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-