It was reported that the patient experienced a severe adverse event of painful stimulation that was reported to be probably related to stimulation, and not related to system other or implant.Information was received regarding the patient's reported "painful stimulation".It was noted this painful stimulation was of "moderate" severity, and "probably related" to vittaria system stimulation with rationale "subject complains of pain where vagal nerve stimulator is located in neck since his defibrillator shocked this morning.It resolves when he places the magnet over his neck".It was also noted to be "possibly related" to the patient's underlying disease with pi rationale "this started immediately after his defibrillator device shocked him".It was stated that the action taken with the study treatment is "stimulation interrupted with magnet".It was noted that treatment was required "non-drug treatment", the patient has recovered, and the event is serious noted to be "disabling/incapacitating".It was also noted that there are other possible contributing factors to the serious adverse event, specifically the defibrillator shock.An exact description of the report was given as follows: "subject called with complaints of painful stimulation from vns that woke him up from sleep.Physician received phone call from cardiac device clinic that subject's defibrillator shocked at 5:30 am during a ventricular fibrillation episode, the subject was not aware of this until he received a call from the device clinic that he should seek medical attention.The subject has been unable to tolerate vns since the shock and has kept the magnet on.He has tried to remove it a few times but assesses the pain as 8.5 out 10 and wanted to leave the magnet on.His defibrillator is on the left side, the vns is on his r side and magnet is taped on his neck." it was also stated "subject seen¿vns was able to be turned back on at an acceptable threshold for the subject to tolerate." no additional relevant information has been received to date.
|