• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 06/09/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
High, r.A., winkelman, w., panza, j., sanderson, d.J., yuen, h., halder, g., shaver, c., bird, e.T., rogers, r.G., danford, j.M.Sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in women: do age and comorbidities make a difference? int urogynecol j.2020.Doi: 1 0.1007/s00192-020-04392-4.Summary: to evaluate if age and comorbidities are associated with progression from trial phase to implantation of an implantable pulse generator in women with overactive bladder.Methods this multisite retrospective cohort included women with overactive bladder with or without urinary incontinence who had a trial phase for sacral neuromodulation.The primary outcome was progression to implantation.A sub-analysis of implanted patients was performed for the outcome of additional therapies or ¿implant only¿ for the duration of follow-up.Multivariate logistic regression models including potential predictors of implantation and post-implantation addition of therapies were performed.Results at six academic institutions, 91% (785/864) of patients progressed to implantation.Post-implantation success was achieved by 69% (536/782) of patients at median follow-up of 2 (range 0.3 to 15) years.Odds of implantation [or 0.73 (ci 0.61, 0.88)] and post-implantation success [or 0.78 (ci 0.98, 0.97)] were lower with increasing decades of age.Medical comorbidities evaluated did not affect implantation rates or post-implant success.Conclusions most women have successful sacral neuromodulation trials despite older age and comorbidities.Higher decade of age has a negative effect on odds of implantation and is associated with addition of therapies post-implantation.Comorbidities assessed in this study did not affect implantation or addition of therapies post-implantation.Most women add therapies to improve efficacy post-implantation, and explantation rates are low.Reported events: most patients kept the implant while adding therapies: 63/248 (25%) had device explantation.Despite the need to add therapies after implantation, most patients in our study elected to keep their ipg.The study method does not account for revisions: it is possible that the older patients added therapies while younger patients progressed to surgical intervention of revisions.Further studies are needed to investigate differences in postimplantation symptom management by patient age.No specific device information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key10819484
MDR Text Key217692683
Report Number2182207-2020-01253
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/20/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/10/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-