• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC17
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 10/17/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what is the exact date of the implant? unknown.What is the lot number? unknown.Besides dysphagia were there any other clinical symptoms that provided evidence of erosion and when did they first occur? unknown.Are pictures or videos available of the dilation? unknown.How many beads eroded? unknown.Which best describes the device removal approach? the device was removed laparoscopically, dr.Said he couldn¿t do it endoscopically removed the eroded beads initially & laparoscopically removed the device at a later date.Endoscopically removed the eroded beads & laparoscopically removed the device the same day.Endoscopically removed the entire device; laparoscopically removed the entire device.Was the patient stented? unknown.What is the current condition of the patient? the patient was transferred to dr.Leeds for a follow-up surgery.Unknown after that.Was there any intervention with the erosion of the mesh of feb 2020? some mesh was removed endoscopically.But at the time he said he did not see any linx beads in the esophagus so nothing was done with the linx device at that time.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was a linx implant erosion in the esophagus.17 bead- device.Device was implanted 1 year ago.Patient had a nissen fundoplication undone and replaced with a linx.Also had a recurring hiatal hernia repaired.The physician did an egd (patient was having dysphagia) in (b)(6) 2020, and noticed the rare event of an absorbable mesh had eroded into the esophagus, but did not notice any linx beads at that time.On (b)(6) 2020, he did scope the patient again, and found a linx bead had eroded into the esophagus.Linx device was removed on (b)(6) 2020.Procedure: lap reflux.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 11/23/2020 f10, h6: erosion device analysis: a suture on a wire adjacent to one of the cut wire was observed during the visual assessment.It is known that sometimes, during the explant procedure, a suture is placed on the device to aid in the extraction of the device.Overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, and link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.The lot/batch was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
MDR Report Key10829150
MDR Text Key216391414
Report Number3008766073-2020-00171
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005370
UDI-Public00855106005370
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/16/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLXMC17
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC17
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/06/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/12/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/19/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/23/2020
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient Weight113
-
-