• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Frequency (2275); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 10/10/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient with an implanted neurostimulator (ins) for gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported by the patient that they were not getting therapeutic benefit and that they were feeling stimulation in the thigh.The patient & technical services (pats) agent did not ask about the circumstances that led to the reported issue.The patient noted that had tried going through all 7 programs and felt stimulation more towards the labia on program 5.It was noted that after about 15 minutes on the phone, the patient claimed the stimulation was felt in the thigh and down the leg.Patient services reviewed the option of going through the programs again to see which one targeted the pelvic floor the best.The patient was going to monitor their symptoms and follow up with the health care professional (hcp) as needed.No further complications were reported at this time.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.They reported that when they had the device changed in 2020 it has really never worked and had leg pain but that has resolved.The pain was from the knee to the ankle from the minute they had it put in.Patient said she has been on program 7 at 1.2ma for a long time.Today they increased it to 2.2 but it is annoying.On the call the patient decreased to 2.1ma and then didn't feel the stimulation.Told pt to monitor symptoms for a couple days and see if symptoms improve.Patient is going to the bathroom every 20 minutes and can barely get to the bathroom.When they tested the stimulation in surgery it woke her only at 0.1, that is all they had it at for a while.Then a year later they could go higher on amplitude.Patient said they always felt stimulation in a different place.Even a few weeks ago it was in lower part of buttocks and today feel in leg.No further complications were reported/anticipated at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key10834086
MDR Text Key219366786
Report Number3004209178-2020-19906
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/08/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2021
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/13/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/12/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/10/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/08/2021
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-