MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 3058 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
|
Event Date 11/25/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient regarding their implantable neurostimulator (ins) for fecal incontinence and gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.Patient isn't sure if the device is working for them or not because they started having a return of symptoms which has been "horrible".During the call, the patient had access to their patient programmer (pp) so they synched to their ins which showed stimulation was on; they were at 2.3v on program 4.They have the ability to change programs and/or adjust stimulation so stimulation was increased to 2.7v where they reported being comfortable.The patient was instructed to review any directions previously given to them by their healthcare provider (hcp).It was reviewed that it takes time for body to respond to therapy, therefore titrations should be discussed with their hcp.It was also reviewed to consider completing a voiding diary to track progression/therapeutic response.Therapy expectations (50% reduction in symptoms) was also reviewed.It was lastly reviewed to follow up with the hcp if the problem does not resolve; they will monitor their symptoms now that a change was made.Patient noted that if increasing doesn't resolve the issues, they may consider changing programs and might call back for assistance.No device issue was reported and no further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.Additional information was received from the patient.They reported that it hasn¿t helped and they had worked with a manufacture representative for programming however still hadn¿t helped.The patient wanted the device removed.The patient reported having another planned unrelated surgery and wanted the whole system removed prior to the unrelated surgery.The patient was attempting to get a hold of the healthcare professional office but had not heard back.The patient was redirected to their healthcare professional.The patient relevant medical history included them being diabetic and having an insulin pump.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|