• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Problems Break (1069); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/18/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the jet7 was fractured approximately 1.0 cm from the hub.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned jet7 revealed a fracture underneath the strain relief.If the jet7 is forcefully manipulated at extreme angles during use, damage such this may occur.During functional testing, the jet7 was flushed with air while submerged in the bleach solution, and bubbles were observed coming from the fractured location underneath the strain relief.Penumbra catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2020-02006, 3005168196-2020-02008.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheter (jet7) and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).It was noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician noticed the jet7 was leaking just beyond the hub while in use in the patient.Therefore, the jet7 was removed.Another jet7 was used to continue the procedure; however, the same issue occurred.It was also reported that while the neuron max was still inside the patient, the physician noticed that it was kinked; the neuron max was also removed.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) and another neuron max.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report.1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem this report is associated with mfr report numbers: 1.3005168196-2020-02006 2.3005168196-2020-02008 h3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the internal carotid artery (ica) using penumbra system jet 7 reperfusion catheters (jet7)s and a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).It was noted that the patient''s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician noticed the jet7 was leaking just beyond the hub on the back table.Therefore, the jet7 was not used in the procedure.Another jet7 was used to continue the procedure; however, the same issue occurred.It was also reported that while the neuron max was still inside the patient, the physician noticed that it was kinked; the neuron max was also removed.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system ace 68 reperfusion catheter (ace68) and another neuron max.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM JET7 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10847225
MDR Text Key217137292
Report Number3005168196-2020-02007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948020962
UDI-Public00815948020962
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K190010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/18/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/21/2023
Device Model Number5MAXJET7KIT-B
Device Catalogue Number5MAXJET7KIT
Device Lot NumberF95680
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/22/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/18/2020
Initial Date FDA Received11/16/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/03/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-