It was reported that a revision surgery was performed as patient has complained of anterior knee pain increasing in severity.The patella bone was resected and new resurfacing patella implanted.The affected complaint device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.Therefore a product analysis could not be performed.Our investigation including a review of the manufacturing records for the listed batch did not reveal any deviation from the standard manufacturing processes.A review of the complaint history for the listed part revealed no prior complaints for the listed failure mode.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of risk management files and the instructions for use found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.A clinical evaluation noted that based on the x-rays/information provided, the reported ¿overstuffing¿ and laterally riding patella were likely the root cause of the reported event.The patient impact beyond the reported increasing pain and subsequent revision procedure could not be determined, as the patient outcome remains unknown.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however smith and nephew will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.We consider this investigation closed.
|