It was reported that during use in a patient, when pulling this fogarty catheter out of the artery, the catheter unsheathed leaving a metal piece from the catheter body sticking out of catheter.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was not available for evaluation as it was discarded.Patient demographics were unable to be obtained.The device was not returned for evaluation; it was discarded at the hospital.Without return of the unit it is not possible to determine if some damage or defect existed on the unit that could have contributed to the event.It is not known if some procedural factors may have contributed to the event.No corrective actions will be taken at this time.A review of the manufacturing records indicated that the product met specifications upon release.As part of the manufacturing process a 100% of the units go through a final inspection process.Based on the procedures if the units had a defect it would have been captured during the inspection process.Balloon rupture and catheter separation, as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material, are the most frequent causes of reported failures.To minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, the maximum recommended inflation volume and pull force for the catheter should not be exceeded.The arterial embolectomy catheter is not recommended for the removal of fibrous, adherent, or calcified material (e.G.Chronic clot, atherosclerotic plaque).This catheter is not designed to withstand the additional pull force needed to remove these materials.The instructions for use of the product contains the following statement: ¿as with all catheterization procedures, complications may occur.These may include local or systemic infection, local hematomas, intimal disruption, arterial dissection, perforation and vessel rupture, hemorrhage, arterial thrombosis, distal embolization of blood clots and atherosclerotic plaque, air embolus, aneurysm, arterial spasm, arteriovenous fistula formation, and balloon rupture with fragmentation, tip separation and distal embolization.¿ complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
It was reported that during use in a patient, when pulling this fogarty catheter out of the artery, the catheter unsheathed leaving a metal piece from the catheter body sticking out of catheter.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was not available for evaluation as it was discarded.Patient demographics were unable to be obtained.
|