Model Number HPO01XF |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Burn, Thermal (2530)
|
Event Date 08/31/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6) 2020 - we have requested the device to returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.To date, we have not received the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
(b)(6) 2020 - the incident occurred on (b)(6) 2020 but the consumer did not report this claim until (b)(6) 2020.The consumer claims she received a burn while in use of the product.Medical attention was not received.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6) 2020: we have requested the device to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.To date, we have not received the device.(b)(6) 2020: the device was returned on (b)(6) 2021 and the evaluation was complete.Below is the manufacturer narrative: heating pad was energized with 120v and was temperature tested over 1 hour.Unit complied with conair specifications and ul temperature limits.Instructions limit use to 30 min and requires consumer to "check frequently" if sensitive skin.The heating pad was in good working condition when received.As skin sensitivity varies from person to person, we develop heating pads to comply with ul temperature limits.Most all heating pads sold in america must comply with the same limits.Testing confirmed there was no malfunction and the heating pad complied with all temperature limits.I have attached an ib that explains the potential or burns and to look frequently at the area to be treated.
|
|
Event Description
|
(b)(6) 2020: the incident occured on (b)(6) 2020 but the consumer did not report the claim until (b)(6) 2020.The consumer claims she received a burn while in use of the product.Medical attention was not received.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
12/1/2020 - we have requested the device be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.To date, we have not received the device.2/4/2020 - the device was returned on 1/6/2021 and the evaluation was complete.Below is the manufacturers narrative; manufacturer narrative: 2/4/2020 - the device was returned on 1/6/2021 and the evaluation was complete.Below is the manufacturer narrative: heating pad was energized with 120v and was temperature tested over 1 hour.Unit complied with conair specifications and ul temperature limits.Instructions limit use to 30 min and requires consumer to "check frequently" if sensitive skin.The heating pad was in good working condition when received.As skin sensitivity varies from person to person, we develop heating pads to comply with ul temperature limits.Most all heating pads sold in america must comply with the same limits.Testing confirmed there was no malfunction and the heating pad complied with all temperature limits.I have attached an ib that explains the potential or burns and to look frequently at the area to be treated.4/27/2021 - per the fda's request, submitted a supplemental mdr that does not include the age and dob.
|
|
Event Description
|
12/1/2020 - the incident occured on (b)(6) 2020 but the consumer did not report the claim until 11/4/2020.The consumer claims she received a burn while in use of the product.Medical attention was not received.4/27/2021 - per the fda's request, submitted a supplemental mdr that does not include the age and dob.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|