• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number V60
Device Problems Defective Alarm (1014); Defective Component (2292); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problems Hypoxia (1918); Respiratory Distress (2045)
Event Date 11/11/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: (b)(6) 2020.Date of report: 08dec2020.
 
Event Description
The biomed reached out to philips remote service engineer (rse) to report back up alarm failed.The biomed advised error code consistent with backup alarm failed was in the significant event logs.The rse advised suspect central processing unit (cpu) printed circuit board assembly (pcba) as per service manual and rse provided part identification.No diagnostic report (drpt) was provided for review.This was a malfunction of the cpu pcba.The biomed advised the issue is resolved after replacing the cpu pcba.This reporter stated that a patient of unknown age, gender, height, and weight was admitted to a hospital on an unknown date with the admitting diagnosis not reported.No relevant medical history, relevant past drug history or relevant concomitant medical products were reported.While admitted on an unknown date, the patient was prescribed ventilation therapy via the respironics v60 ventilator; prescription, device settings, configuration, patient circuit, and patient interface not reported.While admitted on (b)(6) 2020, the patient was receiving therapy via the v60 device, the device generated a backup alarm failed error code, and the patient experienced an event of respiratory distress and hypoxia; peripheral capillary oxygen saturation values not reported.Hospital staff then removed the patient from the v60 device, administered low flow oxygen via nasal cannula; liters per minute not reported, and was then placed on another ventilator; brand and model not reported.No relevant laboratory data was reported.The patient experienced mild harm with no details reported.The outcome of the patient experiencing mild harm is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
G4: 09dec2020.B4: 09dec2020.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The cpu pcba was returned for failure investigation.No anomalies were noted during visual inspection.Upon further testing, the customer complaint was verified.Root cause is failure of annunciator ls1 due to contamination inside the component.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
V60 VENTILATOR
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad CA 92011
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
carlsbad CA
Manufacturer Contact
bill cole
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad, CA 92011
9093746996
MDR Report Key10972693
MDR Text Key220422877
Report Number2031642-2020-04444
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K082660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberV60
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/12/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/08/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/12/2020
10/14/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/09/2020
03/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKNOWN PATIENT CIRCUIT, MASK, AND HUMIDIFIER.; UNKNOWN PATIENT CIRCUIT, MASK, AND HUMIDIFIER
-
-