• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GELESIS, INC. PLENITY; DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GELESIS, INC. PLENITY; DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MC0420
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Rash (2033)
Event Date 11/10/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product is not retrievable.
 
Event Description
Anaphylaxis [anaphylactic reaction].3 capsules, po, 1 time daily [wrong technique in device usage process].Case narrative: this is a spontaneous report, received from the united states of america initially reported by a physician on 12-nov-2020.A (b)(6)-year-old female patient of weight (b)(6) lbs experienced anaphylactic reaction while on plenity for obesity.The patient¿s medical history was not reported.The patient¿s concomitant medications included celexa (citalopram hydrobromide) (20mg daily), irbesartan (12.5 mg daily) for unknown indication.On an unknown date, the patient started therapy with plenity at a dose of three capsules by mouth once daily (wrong technique in device usage process) for obesity.The lot number included p20114a and expiry date 23-oct-2021.On 10-nov-2020, it was reported that the patient went to emergency department due to severe rash on face and was diagnosed with anaphylaxis (pt: anaphylactic reaction).The patient was treated with epinephrine and steroids (unspecified) and was admitted to intensive care unit (icu).It was reported that the patient was seen by the physician due to the concern of viral infection but was determined the event as allergic reaction.It was reported that the physician thought the allergic reaction was most likely due to celexa 20 mg/daily, which the patient daily administered along with the plenity at same time.The diagnostic tests were not carried out for the event.At the time of this report, therapy with the plenity was discontinued and outcome for the event (anaphylactic reaction) was resolved.The patient would be discharged on (b)(6) 2020 (reported as today).This case was verified by a healthcare professional.Company comment: this spontaneous report by a physician concerns a (b)(6)-year-old female weighing (b)(6) lbs who was diagnosed with anaphylactic reaction while on plenity for obesity.The patient¿s medical history was not reported but included taking medications celexa (citalopram) (20mg daily), irbesartan (12.5 mg daily) for unknown indications.On an unknown date, the patient started therapy with plenity at a dose of three capsules by mouth once daily (pt: wrong technique in device usage process) for obesity; around the same time, patient is reported to have started treatment with celexa (citalopram).After an unknown period since plenity and citalopram administration, patient presented to the emergency department with severe rash on face and was diagnosed with anaphylaxis (pt: anaphylactic reaction) which was treated with epinephrine and steroids (unspecified).Patient was admitted in the intensive care unit (icu) where she was seen by an infectious disease physician for concerns of viral infection which was ruled out and a diagnosis of anaphylactic reaction was established.The physicians suspected that the allergic reaction was most likely due to celexa (citalopram) which the patient took concurrently with plenity.At the time of this report, therapy with the plenity was discontinued and the event (anaphylactic reaction) was resolved and patient was planned for a discharge on 12-nov-2020.The event anaphylactic reaction was assessed as serious as it required hospitalization.The case lacks details on medical history, dechallenge and rechallenge; nevertheless, due to the plausible temporal relationship, causality was assessed as possibly related to plenity.Nonetheless, celexa (citalopram) is a strong confounder in this case, in alignment with the hospital physician assessment and the fact that anaphylaxis has been observed during the post marketing evaluation of celexa (citalopram).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PLENITY
Type of Device
DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section G)
GELESIS, INC.
Manufacturer Contact
501 boylston street, suite 610
2
boston, MA 02116
MDR Report Key10975537
MDR Text Key220464805
Report Number3012121187-2020-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QFQ
UDI-Device Identifier00860517002641
UDI-Public00860517002641
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/09/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/23/2021
Device Model NumberMC0420
Device Lot NumberP20114A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/09/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CELEXA (CELECOXIB),; IRBESARTAN AL (IRBESARTAN),
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Weight73
-
-