It was reported that there was an issue with a prestige grasper.During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, a malfunction occurred.Separation was noted at the proximal weld of the device; the weld broke at joint of handle and rotation knob.There was a surgical delay.However, there was no patient harm nor additional medical intervention required.
|
The device was not returned for evaluation of the broken proximal weld and a lot number was not provided.A supplier corrective action request (scar) was initiated due to an adverse trend observed for devices exhibiting failure at the thumb-loop assembly joint.The supplier evaluated the malfunction by looking at devices with a lot number beginning with "m." as a result of their findings, the push rod fixture was redesigned to increase the clearance, which ensured that the fixture appropriately stressed the entirety of the soldering joint.Upon implementing the new fixture, the supplier tested returned non-conforming samples, and verified that the soldering no longer hung up on the new fixture, as had been observed on the previous one.All device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Additionally, historical scrap rates were reviewed with no increase observed in scrap related to the complaint issues.In addition to the redesign of the soldering fixture, the supplier reviewed the work instruction for the torch soldering operation and identified improvement opportunities.The original work instruction was used to better define the soldering process with a more focused emphasis on the following: equipment startup and shutoff operations, clear imagery of acceptable soldered subassemblies, and clarified cleaning operations for components prior to soldering.A second dedicated work instruction was implemented to better define the attribute inspection criteria for the brazing process used for the solder between the thumb loop and rotator block.Due to the fact that the device was not returned, the failure mode of proximal weld failure was not confirmed.However, this event likely occurred due to inadequacies in the defined production process which limited the device performance.Therefore, the most probable root cause is considered to be manufacturing related.In addition to a supplier corrective action request (scar) being initiated, a corrective action/preventive action (capa) was opened by aesculap inc.For further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
|