The technical assistance center at olympus instructed the customer to return the device to olympus for evaluation.The device has yet to be returned to olympus.Multiple documented attempts have been made to obtain additional information regarding any potential patient impact.If additional information is received and/or the device is returned to olympus, a supplemental report will be submitted, as applicable.
|
This report is being supplemented based on additional information provided by the legal manufacturer¿s investigation.The legal manufacturer cannot conclusively determine the cause of the user¿s experience, but they presumed that the device in question had passed about 7 years since its manufacturing, and that it was an event in which the internal board deteriorated and broke down due to aging caused by repeated use for a long period of time.It is assumed that the internal board could not be started properly, and that the device concerned was judged to be a main body malfunction, and the front panel blinked.A review of the dhr found no abnormality during the manufacturing of the device.The device instrument history was reviewed and showed that the device was purchased by the user facility on april 27, 2013 and the device has not yet been returned to olympus for service.
|