This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected and additional information.Event description: it was reported that patient (id: (b)(6) taking part in the mymobility clinical study had an initial right tha on (b)(6) 2020.The patient was revised on (b)(6) 2020 due to pain, difficulty ambulating, and tissue damage.The surgeon reported that there was nothing wrong with the screws themselves, they were just placed in a position that was causing soft tissue irritation and were, therefore, removed.Review of received data: due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.Study report mymobility: mymobility clinical study patient id: (b)(6), female, born on (b)(6) 1957, height 162, 50 cm, weight 48, 50 kg, bmi: 18,30.Significant past medical history: osteoarthritis, thyroid disease, contralateral hip in 2016.On (b)(6) 2020: pre-op health score ¿ 80.No intra-operative compilations identified.D/c home with aspirin for dvt prophylaxis.Participant changed their mind and requested home health pt and mymobility.On (b)(6) 2020 (1-month visit): full weight bearing with antalgic gait.Pain ¿ buttock shooting (radiating) down the leg.Limb length ¿ equal.Health score ¿ 51, neutral-satisfied.On (b)(6) 2020 (3-month visit): full weight bearing with antalgic gait.Good rom, no pain on physical exam, limb lengths are equal.Moderate pain, moderate problems walking.Health score ¿ 80.I had hematoma in the surgical area which caused swelling and severe pains on the right hip and leg.Taking oxycodone caused nausea, shortness of breath.The hematoma was not excised.This was a ed diagnosis.This could be possibly be related to the ct findings of screw protrusion found later on (b)(6) 2020.The patient would have been cleared of all anesthesia products.Some patients are more sensitive to pain medications and can display a wide range of reactions and sensitivities.Radicular symptoms consistent with l5 nerve root compression.Not related to the device or procedure.Usual causes are ddd, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or compression fracture.Degeneration of lumbar intervertebral disc, lumbar radiculopathy.Not device or procedure related.On (b)(6) 2020: persistent right hip pain.On (b)(6) 2020: ct hip w/o iv contrast.On (b)(6) 2020 (6-month visit): i have severe problems in walking about.I have severe pain or discomfort.Health score ¿ 40.On (b)(6) 2020: right hip revision, removal of hardware.Painful right tha.Spinal plus mac anesthesia, ebl 150 ml.X-rays at the time of surgery showed good hardware alignment without complication.Ct scan showed the most superior screw went through the superior cortex of the ilieum and was likely irritating the iliopsoas muscle belly.Fluid cultures sent (no report).Fluid not consistent with infection.Surgical report: revision report, date of service on (b)(6) 2020: x-rays at the time of surgery showed good hardware alignment without complication.However, postop follow-up films of slightly different angle showed possible screw penetration beyond the cortical rim of the pelvis and a ct scan was obtained and this showed that the most superior screw went through the superior cortex of the ilium and was likely irritating the iliopsoas muscle belly.We began with surgical incision along the previous scar.We debrided scar tissue from the anterior and superior rim of the acetabulum.We then removed the acetabular liner using osteotomes and removed both acetabular screws.The acetabular component was osseointegrated.Impaction of a new liner and trial reduction with a 36 +0 head.Mounting of a biolox option 36 +0 head.Closure.X-rays: in total 7 x-rays, reported to have been taken on (b)(6) 2020, have been received.The reported screw protrusion can be confirmed based on the provided radiographs.Product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the compatibility check was performed from www.Productcompatibility.Zimmer.Com and showed that the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet.Dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Conclusion: it was reported that patient (id: (b)(6) taking part in the mymobility clinical study had an initial right tha on (b)(6) 2020.The patient was revised on (b)(6) 2020 due to pain, difficulty ambulating, and tissue damage.The surgeon reported that there was nothing wrong with the screws themselves, they were just placed in a position that was causing soft tissue irritation and were, therefore, removed.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a nonconformance or a complaint out of box (coob).Investigation revealed that the incorrect screw placement (protrusion of the screw) caused tissue irritation and pain, which led to revision surgery.The biolox head was replaced during revision to restore the biomechanics of the joint with a smaller offset.Thus, there was no device problem of the biolox head.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|