• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, SA VITEK MS; VITEK® MS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, SA VITEK MS; VITEK® MS Back to Search Results
Model Number 410895
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A biomérieux internal investigation was completed in response to this customer complaint.A complaint review was performed and did not identify any similar complaints related to the misidentification of vibrio parahaemolyticus as vibrio alginolyticus.The customer's raw data was reviewed for this investigation.Fine tuning: according to the vilink alert tool criteria, a fine tuning was needed during the tests made on (b)(6) 2020.However, the fine tuning indicators acceptance criteria could be affected by the quality of the spot preparation and by the calibrator culture, it might not reflect the real status of the system.It was confirmed by analyzing the ¿all peaks number¿ from calibrator strain during the period of the tests.Spot preparation quality: the customer¿s spot preparation quality was not optimal.The calibrator and sample ¿all peaks¿ values are quite heterogeneous.Knowledge base (kb) review: the expected identification is vibrio parahaemolyticus which is present in the vitek ms knowledge base (b)(4).Sample data analysis: the analysis of the mzml samples files shows that number of all peaks were heterogeneous (between 37 and 112).The misidentification is obtained from the spectra having the lowest number of peaks (37) which is near the acceptable limit (30) for giving an ¿identification¿ result or a ¿no identification¿ result.This could be explained by a non-optimal spot preparation of the sample strain.Root cause: from the data gathered during the investigation, the most likely root cause was determined to be non-optimal spot preparation.Local customer service (lcs) has been requested to provide the customer with additional training materials to improve spot preparation technique.
 
Event Description
A customer in (b)(6) notified biomérieux of obtaining a misidentification of vibrio parahaemolyticus as vibrio aliginolyticus while testing an (b)(6) proficiency sample with the vitek® ms (ref 410895, serial (b)(4)).Repeat analysis with the vitek® ms obtained the expected identification of vibrio parahaemolyticus.Initial vitek® ms: vibrio aliginolyticus; repeat vitek® ms: vibrio parahaemolyticus; expected: vibrio parahaemolyticus.As this was a proficiency sample, there is no patient involved.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK MS
Type of Device
VITEK® MS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR  38390
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR   38390
Manufacturer Contact
matthew locus
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
MDR Report Key11033016
MDR Text Key241369396
Report Number9615754-2020-00193
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QBN
UDI-Device Identifier03573026359119
UDI-Public03573026359119
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K181412
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number410895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/22/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/17/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-