Model Number 508-32-204 |
Device Problems
Positioning Problem (3009); Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure (3023)
|
Patient Problem
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
Event Date 11/20/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|
|
Event Description
|
Revision surgery - failed baseplate.Original position of baseplate was almost 90° to the face of the glenoid.Possible infection as well, surgeon removed old baseplate and glenosphere and replaced with 36 neutral and semi constrained poly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data: manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken baseplate central screw and a possible infection.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 5 months and 3 weeks apart.The outcome of this event was disability and permanent damage to the patient.The healthcare professional indicated there was significant adverse event to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) shows that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to a broken baseplate central screw and a possible infection.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were the source or had a direct connection with the broken center screw or the patient's infection.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to inhibited the patient's immune system.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as broken baseplate central screw and a possible infection.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 5 months and 3 weeks apart.Disability or permanent damage was reported.The healthcare professional indicated there was significant adverse event to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) shows that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to a broken baseplate central screw and a possible infection.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were the source or had a direct connection with the broken center screw or the patient's infection.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the broken center screw or inhibited the patient's immune system.There are multiple factors, outside the control of djo surgical, that may contribute to an event.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|