H3.Device evaluation by manufacturer: the aquabeam robotic system was not returned for investigation as it is currently in use at the user facility.A review of the aquabeam robotic system's log file was reviewed, which confirmed no malfunctions during the aquablation procedure.The review indicated that the system functioned as designed.A review of the device history record (dhr) for ab2000-b/serial number (b)(6) was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the device met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.A review for similar complaints under ab2000-b/18c00764 confirmed no other similar events.A review of similar complaints across all other systems confirmed found no similar events.The aquabeam robotic system instructions for use, ifu0101-00 rev.E, states: 3.Contraindications.Do not use the aquabeam robotic system in patients who do not meet the indication for the system's intended use.The aquabeam robotic system was not returned for investigation of this complaint.A review of the log file confirmed that the system was primed successfully, and no errors were observed.There was no aquablation performed, and the system did not progress past the aquabeam handpiece setup step.The reported bladder perforation occurred during a non-aquablation procedure with a non-procept device.Based on the information received, plus the review of the log file, dhr and ifu, the event is considered not to be device related.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|