• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD RESONANCE STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD RESONANCE STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Use of Device Problem (1670); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/27/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Department of urology, (b)(6).Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Miyazaki, 2019, ¿the resonance® metallic ureteral stent in the treatment of malignant ureteralobstruction: a prospective observational study¿ "70¿80% of our patients with a resonance stent did not need to have their stent changed at 1 year." this complaint was opened to capture the use error of not removing the rms stents after 12 months indwell period, the qty of patients affected is 5 (based on 70-80% of 7 patients remaining in the study).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the resonance stent sets of unknown lot number and rpn involved in this complaint were not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.As the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution all rms devices are subject to visual a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.As per instructions for use (ifu0020-18): ¿these stents are not intended as permanent indwelling devices.¿ ¿the stent must now remain indwelling for more than twelve (12) months.If the patient¿s status permits, the stent may be replaced with a new stent.¿ there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the user did not follow the instructions for use as per the conclusion of the article it was stated that 70-80% of the patients with a resonance stent did not need to have their stent changed at one year.Per the clinical input received it was agreed that this was the case for five of patients.Although this is not a definitive statement it was concluded by medical affairs that ¿since these are in the majority palliative patients i think it is likely that if the stents did not need to be removed then they probably weren¿t.¿ root cause review: a definitive root cause is attributed to user error can be attributed to the user error of not replacing the device at 12 months post implant as is required.Summary: complaint is confirmed based on the customers testimony.According to the initial report, the patient suffered no adverse effects.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESONANCE STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
aisling hassett
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key11046096
MDR Text Key244418854
Report Number3001845648-2020-00969
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K063742
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/27/2019
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/11/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/11/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-