• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE MENSTRUAL; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE MENSTRUAL; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Lot Number EC2277
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Skin Tears (2516)
Event Date 12/10/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Event verbatim: pain ripped my skin off ,skin exfoliation.Narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (patient).A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare menstrual), via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date at an unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient was using the menstrual cramp pad, correctly.Sticky side in the underwear, soft side against skin.And two hours into wearing it the patient started being in pain so patient went to the restroom to see why and when the patient pulled pants and underwear down, the soft side ripped the skin off on an unspecified date.The patient was very concerned about why the product did this.The patient can send pictures then if needed.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was unknown.The event outcome was unknown.Additional information has been requested, and will be provided as it becomes available.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] pain [pain], ripped my skin off [skin exfoliation], , narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (patient).A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare menstrual) lot #ec2277, expiration date 30jun2023, via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date at an unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient was using the menstrual cramp pad, correctly.Sticky side in the underwear, soft side against skin.And two hours into wearing it the patient started being in pain so patient went to the restroom to see why and when the patient pulled pants and underwear down, the soft side ripped the skin off on an unspecified date.The patient was very concerned about why the product did this.The patient can send pictures then if needed.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was unknown.The event outcome was unknown.Additional information has been requested and will be provided as it becomes available.Follow-up (16dec2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group included product lot number and expiration date.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term].Pain [pain], ripped my skin off [skin exfoliation], narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (patient).A patient of unspecified age and gender started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare menstrual) lot #ec2277, expiration date 30jun2023, via an unspecified route of administration from an unspecified date at an unknown frequency for an unspecified indication.The patient medical history and concomitant medications were not reported.The patient was using the menstrual cramp pad, correctly.Sticky side in the underwear, soft side against skin.And two hours into wearing it the patient started being in pain so patient went to the restroom to see why and when the patient pulled pants and underwear down, the soft side ripped the skin off on an unspecified date.The patient was very concerned about why the product did this.The patient can send pictures then if needed.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was unknown.The event outcome was unknown.According to product quality group: complaint sub-class: adverse event/serious/unknown.Summary of investigation: batch ec2277 is the only batch within the scope of this investigation.Thermacare batches are produced as individual lots.The device history record (dhr), reserve samples, and trending were evaluated.No quality issues were identified.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).After a review of the batch thermal records, thermal results all met product release criteria.Consumer reports "the soft side ripped my skin off." the cause of the consumer reporting "the soft side ripped my skin off" is inconclusive since review of records does not provide evidence to support defective product.The product effect may vary with each individual.Care should be taken when using the device, following all safety and use information as provided with the wrap to avoid the risks of burns or other skin irritations.The plant has reviewed the dhr for this lot from a manufacturing perspective.No quality issues were identified upon this review of dhr, release testing data or, inspection of retained samples.Retained samples met the product description and the product is within expiration date.The product quality for the lot is not impacted by this complaint.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: an evaluation of the complaint confirms that this is the first complaint for the sub class adverse event/serious/unknown received at the albany site requiring an evaluation for this batch.On the basis of this evaluation, a trend does not exist for this lot.Lot trend actions taken: a trend does not exist for this lot.Exped trend assmt.& rationale: an evaluation was made by searching for possible trends for this subclass requiring investigation by the site.Based on this citi search, a trend does not exist for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products the data did not show an increase over time (36 months).There is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products, refer to attachment trending chart adverse event serious unknown menstrual (b)(6) 2017 to (b)(6) 2020.A return sample has not been received at the site.Follow-up (16dec2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group included product lot number and expiration date.Follow-up (22dec2020): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (05jan2021): new information received from product quality complaint group includes investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint sub-class: adverse event/serious/unknown.Summary of investigation: batch ec2277 is the only batch within the scope of this investigation.Thermacare batches are produced as individual lots.The device history record (dhr), reserve samples, and trending were evaluated.No quality issues were identified.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).After a review of the batch thermal records, thermal results all met product release criteria.Consumer reports "the soft side ripped my skin off." the cause of the consumer reporting "the soft side ripped my skin off" is inconclusive since review of records does not provide evidence to support defective product.The product effect may vary with each individual.Care should be taken when using the device, following all safety and use information as provided with the wrap to avoid the risks of burns or other skin irritations.The plant has reviewed the dhr for this lot from a manufacturing perspective.No quality issues were identified upon this review of dhr, release testing data or, inspection of retained samples.Retained samples met the product description and the product is within expiration date.The product quality for the lot is not impacted by this complaint.Lot trend assmt.& rationale: an evaluation of the complaint confirms that this is the first complaint for the sub class adverse event/serious/unknown received at the albany site requiring an evaluation for this batch.On the basis of this evaluation, a trend does not exist for this lot.Lot trend actions taken: a trend does not exist for this lot.Exped trend assmt.& rationale: an evaluation was made by searching for possible trends for this subclass requiring investigation by the site.Based on this citi search, a trend does not exist for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products the data did not show an increase over time (36 months).There is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products, refer to attachment trending chart adverse event serious unknown menstrual (b)(6) 2017 to (b)(6) 2020.A return sample has not been received at the site.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint sub-class: adverse event/serious/unknown.Summary of investigation:batch ec2277 is the only batch within the scope of this investigation.Thermacare batches are produced as individual lots.The device history record (dhr), reserve samples, and trending were evaluated.No quality issues were identified.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).After a review of the batch thermal records, thermal results all met product release criteria.Consumer reports "the soft side ripped my skin off." the cause of the consumer reporting "the soft side ripped my skin off" is inconclusive since review of records does not provide evidence to support defective product.The product effect may vary with each individual.Care should be taken when using the device, following all safety and use information as provided with the wrap to avoid the risks of burns or other skin irritations.The plant has reviewed the dhr for this lot from a manufacturing perspective.No quality issues were identified upon this review of dhr, release testing data or, inspection of retained samples.Retained samples met the product description and the product is within expiration date.The product quality for the lot is not impacted by this complaint.Lot trend assmt.& rationale:an evaluation of the complaint confirms that this is the first complaint for the sub class adverse event/serious/unknown received at the albany site requiring an evaluation for this batch.On the basis of this evaluation, a trend does not exist for this lot.Lot trend actions taken: a trend does not exist for this lot.Exped trend assmt.& rationale:an evaluation was made by searching for possible trends for this subclass requiring investigation by the site.Based on this citi search, a trend does not exist for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products the data did not show an increase over time (36 months).There is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products, refer to trending chart adverse event serious unknown menstrual 10dec2017 to 10dec2020.A return sample has not been received at the site.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] pain [pain], ripped my skin off [skin exfoliation].Narrative: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (patient).A 26-year-old female patient started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare menstrual) lot #ec2277, expiration date 30jun2023, via an unspecified route of administration on 10dec2020 used at one time for cramps.The patient medical history was not reported.There were no concomitant medications.The patient was using the menstrual cramp pad, correctly.Sticky side in the underwear, soft side against skin.And two hours into wearing it the patient started being in pain so patient went to the restroom to see why and when the patient pulled pants and underwear down, the soft side ripped the skin off on (b)(6) 2020.The patient was very concerned about why the product did this.The patient can send pictures then if needed.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was permanently withdrawn on (b)(6) 2020.The event outcome was resolved on unknown date.According to product quality group: complaint sub-class: adverse event/serious/unknown.Summary of investigation:batch ec2277 is the only batch within the scope of this investigation.Thermacare batches are produced as individual lots.The device history record (dhr), reserve samples, and trending were evaluated.No quality issues were identified.Conclusion: the root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).After a review of the batch thermal records, thermal results all met product release criteria.Consumer reports "the soft side ripped my skin off." the cause of the consumer reporting "the soft side ripped my skin off" is inconclusive since review of records does not provide evidence to support defective product.The product effect may vary with each individual.Care should be taken when using the device, following all safety and use information as provided with the wrap to avoid the risks of burns or other skin irritations.The plant has reviewed the dhr for this lot from a manufacturing perspective.No quality issues were identified upon this review of dhr, release testing data or, inspection of retained samples.Retained samples met the product description and the product is within expiration date.The product quality for the lot is not impacted by this complaint.Lot trend assmt.& rationale:an evaluation of the complaint confirms that this is the first complaint for the sub class adverse event/serious/unknown received at the albany site requiring an evaluation for this batch.On the basis of this evaluation, a trend does not exist for this lot.Lot trend actions taken: a trend does not exist for this lot.Exped trend assmt.& rationale:an evaluation was made by searching for possible trends for this subclass requiring investigation by the site.Based on this citi search, a trend does not exist for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products the data did not show an increase over time (36 months).There is not a trend identified for the subclass of adverse event/serious/unknown for menstrual 8hr products, refer to trending chart adverse event serious unknown menstrual (b)(6) 2017 to (b)(6) 2020.A return sample has not been received at the site.Follow-up (16dec2020): new information received from a product quality complaint group included product lot number and expiration date.Follow-up (22dec2020): follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (05jan2021): new information received from product quality complaint group includes investigation results.Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.Follow-up (26jan2021): new information received from the same contactable consumer included: patient age, gender, concomitant product(none), product therapy date and event data (onset date, no treatment received and outcome).Follow-up attempts are completed.No further information is expected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE MENSTRUAL
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key11047944
MDR Text Key223726418
Report Number1066015-2020-00204
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2023
Device Lot NumberEC2277
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/21/2020
01/08/2021
02/05/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age26 YR
Patient Weight82
-
-