• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER; QEX, QEW

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER; QEX, QEW Back to Search Results
Model Number CATRXKIT
Device Problem Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/22/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the left anterior descending artery (lad) using an indigo system catrx aspiration catheter (catrx) and guidewire (bmw).During the procedure, the physician made several passes in the target location using the catrx and subsequently removed the catrx.The physician then took an angiogram and decided to make a few more passes.While attempting to reload the catrx back on the guidewire, the physician experienced resistance, and could not advance the guidewire through the rapid exchange lumen of the catrx.Therefore, the catrx was removed.The procedure was completed using a new catrx and the same guidewire.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the device in complaint was not expected to be returned; however, on 10-mar-2021 the device was received.Based on this information, corrections were made to: 1.Section d.Box 10: device available for evaluation? (do not send to fda) 2.Section h.Box 3: device returned to manufacturer? 3.Section h.Box 3: device evaluated by manufacturer? 4.Section h.Box 6: method code 1, method code 2, and method code 3 5.Section h.Box 6: results code 1 6.Section h.Box 6.Conclusions code 1 evaluation of the returned catrx revealed that the guidewire lumen was damaged on its proximal end and the catheter was kinked proximal to the guidewire lumen.If the device is forcefully manipulated against resistance, damage such as this may occur.During functional testing, a demonstration guidewire was advanced through the guidewire lumen with minor resistance due to the damaged proximal shaft of the guidewire lumen.Further evaluation revealed an additional kink, a fracture, and additional bends.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint.The tubing was undamaged.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM CATRX ASPIRATION CATHETER
Type of Device
QEX, QEW
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key11052010
MDR Text Key226016327
Report Number3005168196-2020-02331
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QEX
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017556
UDI-Public00814548017556
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K163618
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/24/2023
Device Model NumberCATRXKIT
Device Catalogue NumberCATRXKIT
Device Lot NumberF99114
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/10/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/27/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/26/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/23/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
-
-