• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBEC-125
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 11/20/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported oad and guide wire were received for analysis.The oad was fractured at the distal edge of the crown, and the fractured segment of the driveshaft was engaged on the guide wire.No additional damage was observed on the oad or guide wire.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the fracture faces and identified fatigue striations.It is hypothesized that this driveshaft underwent excessive flexing near the crown due to spinning in excessive tortuosity or resistance that pushed the driveshaft into a tight bend shape, although the exact root cause of the fracture is undetermined.The coronary oas instructions for use states, "never force the crown if any resistance is felt within the vessel as vessel perforation may occur.If resistance is felt, retract the crown, while monitoring the cause of the resistance, and immediately stop treatment.Use fluoroscopy to analyze the situation and to monitor the cause of the resistance." at the conclusion of the device analysis, the reported event of a driveshaft fracture was confirmed.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.The material inspection report for this guide wire lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The diamondback coronary orbital atherectomy device (oad) was selected for treatment of the 95% stenosed left anterior descending coronary artery (lad).Three treatments were performed on low speed in a proximal to distal direction.On the fourth treatment, the oad would not advance through the lesion on glideassist mode.The driveshaft was observed to be fractured at the distal edge of the crown.A snare was used to retrieve the oad fragment.The patient was in good condition following the procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 CORONARY ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
CORONARY ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old highway 8 nw
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
1225 old highway 8 nw
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
sarah hicks
1225 old highway 8 nw
saint paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key11055174
MDR Text Key223134859
Report Number3004742232-2020-00421
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier10852528005794
UDI-Public(01)10852528005794(17)220430(10)322412
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P130005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/22/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2022
Device Model NumberDBEC-125
Device Lot Number322412
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/14/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/25/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/09/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age88 YR
-
-