The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number.Therefore, the expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device remains implanted and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that spaceoar was implanted during a spaceoar placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.Reportedly, the needle was difficult to position.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the perirectal fat layer at the apex of the prostate was thin, and puncture was performed once.However, it was difficult to reach the target location so the needle was returned to the rectal urethral muscle and it was redirected.Reportedly, hydrodissection and spaceoar placement were performed without problem.On (b)(6) 2020, magnetic resonance imaging (mri) was performed for planning before intensity modulated radiation therapy (imrt) was performed.The result showed that part of the spaceoar was placed in the anterior wall of the rectum.The physician concluded that it seemed that spaceoar had partially flowed into the layer created during the first needle puncture.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient is planned to receive radiation therapy on (b)(6) 2020 with (2gy/39fr/12 weeks).
|