|
Model Number M00565100 |
Device Problem
Premature Activation (1484)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/27/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on november 30, 2020 that a wallflex colonic stent was to be implanted in the colon during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, outside the patient, the stent prematurely deployed inside the scope when the delivery system was inserted into the scope.Another wallflex colonic stent was implanted to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on november 30, 2020 that a wallflex colonic stent was to be implanted in the colon during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, outside the patient, the stent prematurely deployed inside the scope when the delivery system was inserted into the scope.Another wallflex colonic stent was implanted to complete the procedure.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: problem code 1484 captures the reportable event of stent prematurely deployed.Block h10: a wallflex colonic stent delivery system was received for analysis; the stent was not returned.Visual examination found the outer clear sheath and the inner sheath were returned kinked and the handle was returned slightly bent.No other issues were noted to the delivery system.The reported event of stent premature deployment could not be confirmed.This failure occurred during the procedure and it is not possible to replicate in the laboratory of analysis.Taking all available information into consideration, the investigation concluded that the reported events and the observed failures were likely due to procedural factors encountered during the procedure.It may be that the technique used by the user when the device was inserted through the scope could have caused the kinks in the outer and inner sheath and resulted to premature deployment of the stent.Additionally, how the device was handled or manipulated during the procedure could have caused the handle to be slightly bent.Therefore, a review and analysis of all available information indicated the most probable cause is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A labeling review was performed, and from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|