It was reported that the patient was admitted to hospital for chemotherapy after breast cancer surgery.The dressing was applied to fix catheter.Four days later, it was found that there was rash, swelling and pruritus around the puncture point, and partial fusion and collapse and then treated with a small amount of exudation, using gauze bandage fixed.
|
H3, h6: we have now concluded our investigation for the complaint received.A review of the associated batch manufacturing records did not identify any issue at the point of manufacture which may have caused or contributed to the issue highlighted by the complainant.In addition it can be confirmed that all finished product specification testing was satisfied at the point of release.The complaint history file contains further instances/ related events of the reported event.The device was used for treatment.No samples were returned for analysis.The reported issue may be attributed to procedural technique.A clinical investigation concluded; the information provided is insufficient to determine whether the patient¿s symptoms are due to a pre-existing or concurrent medical condition (allergy history, skin/dermal sensitivities).It was further communicated, the catheter was fixed using an aiginate dressing and the rash is no longer present.Therefore, since no further harm is anticipated, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.The instructions for use provides comprehensive instructions of the operation, use and limitations of the device.The associated risk file contains the reported event.We have not been able to confirm a relationship between the event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.No further actions by smith and nephew are deemed necessary at this stage.However, we will continue to monitor for any adverse trends relating to this product range.Smith and nephew acknowledge customer concern and are continually investigating ways to develop and improve our products.
|