The company investigation indicated that implant breakage can result from trauma, practicing severe sports, development of hyper-kyphosis, inserting the pedicle screws in a wrong trajectory, not working according to the surgical technique, and most commonly from the implant reaching its end of the way.Breakages were evident in 3 main regions, the implant base, the main rod, and the rod's connection to the poly-axial joint.The most common point of failure was the implant rod in implants reaching their maximal elongation.Over the years, the company already implemented corrective action with the following: ·in (b)(6) 2017, all surgeons received a letter detailing the importance of screw insertion trajectory.The topic is also covered in the company's training presentation.·eco-38, replaced the mid-c 125 that extends by 40 mm to mid-c 125 that extends by 50mm allowing more overlap between the pole and base.·eco-46, a trial tool was added to the surgical tools to aid the surgeon in detecting if access tissue remains below the implant.·in (b)(6) 2020, the topic of practicing severe sports was added to the mid-c training presentation.As part of apifix commitment to continuous improvement, capa #(b)(4) was initiated to further investigate to prevent and minimize the rate of implant breakage rate.Risk assessment: before the mitigations, the device breakage rate was 4.42%.And post mitigations (including this complaint) it is currently 1.53% which is in line with the rate reported in the literature for this type of complications as described in the company's clinical evaluation report ( 0.2%-15.5%) ( (b)(4) rev r).The risk of the broken rod has been assessed and found to be acceptable ((b)(4) rev q1 hazard id 1.8).
|