Investigation ¿ evaluation.Hospital (b)(6) in spain informed cook that the hub on an ultrathane mac-loc locking loop multipurpose drainage catheter from an unknown lot separated after placement.The catheter was placed on (b)(6) 2020.On (b)(6) 2020, the patient noticed the catheter hub was separated.The device was removed and replaced without adverse effects to the patient.A review of the complaint history, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control of the device, as well as a visual inspection of a photo of the complaint device provided by the user, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.The customer did provide a photo of the catheter.The hub is separated and the flare is intact.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.The risk specifications covering mac-loc drainage catheters includes hub separation as a potential failure mode.The identified risk controls include the manufacturing quality control checks and process validation.The technical files covering mac-loc drainage catheters indicate that the risks associated with these devices are acceptable when weighed against the benefits.Inspection activities are currently in place to prevent the release of non-conforming product related to the reported failure mode.The ifu supplied with the mac-loc drainage catheters instruct that the product should be inspected prior to use to ensure no damage has occurred.The lot number for the complaint device was not provided.A search of lots sold to the customer in the three years prior to the event was unable to identify the lot.Therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.There is no evidence of nonconforming material in house or in the field.A capa was previously opened for this product issue.The capa investigation implemented corrective actions related to manufacturing and quality control.Because the lot number is unknown, it is unknown whether the complaint device underwent these corrections.Based on the information provided, no returned product, and the results of the investigation, it is possible that a manufacturing or quality control deficiency contributed to this incident as determined from the capa investigation.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|