• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND; CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR BAND

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND; CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR BAND Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problems Material Integrity Problem (2978); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/04/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lifeband used at the time of the event will not be returned for evaluation, as it was discarded by the customer.Therefore, a physical investigation could not be performed and a root cause could not be determined.The death was not related to the autopulse device.The autopulse is used as an adjunct to manual cpr in cases of clinical death.The benefit of using the autopulse is that it in part substitutes mechanical compressions for the physical labor of manual chest compressions.If the autopulse did not start or unexpectedly stops compressions, rescuer should revert to manual cpr, which is the standard of care.The autopulse was intended to be used as an adjunct to manual cpr on adult patients.In case of stoppage of autopulse the trained user reverts to manual cpr.The transition from autopulse to manual cpr by trained users is similar to the time necessary for rescuer rotation, and presents the same workflow as manual cpr.Hence, based on available information, the patients' outcome was not negatively impacted by the interruptions when compared to standard of care manual cpr.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ohca) is one of the main causes of death in industrial nations.About 25% of patients survive this event and make it to the hospital, and even fewer patients survive after 24 hours (nichol, nejm, 2015).In the united states, survival to hospital discharge after non-traumatic emergency medical services-treated cardiac arrest with any first recorded rhythm was 10.6% for patients of any age.Of the bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2011, 31.4% of victims survived to hospital discharge (mozaffarian, circulation, 2016).Death is an expected outcome for ohca.
 
Event Description
The autopulse platform system was used to resuscitate a (b)(6) male patient in cardiac arrest.The cause of cardiac arrest is unknown, and it was witnessed by the patient's spouse.The patient was in cardiac arrest for about 4 minutes before receiving manual cpr, which was performed by the police, and subsequently, by the fire department for approximately 16 minutes prior to the use of the autopulse platform.After the automated cpr was performed for about 29 minutes, en route to the hospital, the lifeband (lot # unknown) was torn.After the tearing of the lifeband, the ems crew stopped using the autopulse and reverted to manual cpr, which was performed for about 9 minutes.Return of spontaneous circulation (rosc) was not achieved, and the patient was pronounced dead at the hospital.As per the customer, the patient's death was not related to the autopulse system.After the call, while the customer was trying to remove the lifeband from the platform, it was noted that the lifeband was torn at the platform's driveshaft, next to the lifeband clip.When attempting to remove the lifeband clip, the cloth portion of the lifeband became completely detached from its clip, and the lifeband clip could not be removed.Using a knife, the customer cut the lifeband clip into smaller pieces to remove it from the platform.The autopulse platform was tested with another lifeband, and it functioned as intended.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESUSCITATOR BAND
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim nguyen
2000 ringwood ave,
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key11101231
MDR Text Key226857893
Report Number3010617000-2020-01362
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
UDI-Device Identifier10849111001691
UDI-Public10849111001691
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/31/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0706-01
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2020
Initial Date FDA Received12/31/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient Weight98
-
-