Additional narrative: without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent for distal femur osteosynthesis procedure.During the procedure, the collinear clamp was broken off.There were no fragments generated.It was unknown if the procedure completed successfully.The patient outcome was unknown.This complaint involves (1) device.This report is for (1) collinear reduction clamp sliding mechan.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.D11: additional concomitant device reported.Investigation summary: background: it was reported that on an unknown date, the distal femur osteosynthesis procedure begins.The surgeon requires the collinear clamp and at the moment of passing the clamp the handle deforms at the same time it breaks without applying any force.The surgeon decides to continue the procedure using other clamp and the procedure is finished without any affectation to the patient and without any novelty.Available has been disclosed.This complaint involves (1) device.H6: customer quality investigation: the complaint device was not received for investigation.The following investigation is based on the image(s) provided.The image(s) was reviewed, and the complaint condition was confirmed as the device was clearly separated into 2+ pieces.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection and a functional test were not able to be performed.A definitive assignable root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed (based on the images) that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation could not be performed as the lot number could not be determined from the image provided.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|