• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PINNACLE PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR KITS; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PINNACLE PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR KITS; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN Back to Search Results
Model Number M0068317100
Device Problems Defective Device (2588); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Adhesion(s) (1695); Erosion (1750); Discomfort (2330); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 02/19/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2013, implant date, as no event date was reported.(b)(6).(b)(4).The complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a pinnacle pelvic floor repair kits device was implanted into the patient during posterior pinnacle + suspension and repair of enterocele procedure performed on (b)(6) 2013.As reported by the patient's attorney, after the implantation, the patient experienced discomfort.It was not painful rather the sensation of a lump when sitting and lying.On examination, there was a posterior wall erosion and tenderness on the left posterior arm.Subsequently, the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018 for eua, cystoscopy, cystodistention, pr and rectal examination which found 0.5 x 1cm mesh exposure approx.3cm proximal to posterior fourchette.Boston scientific has been unable to obtain additional information regarding the event to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blocks b5 and h6 patient codes and impact codes have been updated based on the additional information received on december 14, 2022.Block b3 date of event: date of event was approximated to february 19, 2013, implant date, as no event date was reported.Block e1: this complaint was received as litigation from a legal source in australia.The implant surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).(b)(6) hospital.Revision surgery surgeons: dr.(b)(6).Dr.(b)(6).(b)(6) hospital.Block h6: imdrf patient codes e2006, e2101 and e2311 capture the reportable events of erosion and revision surgery.Imdrf impact codes f1905 capture the reportable event of extensive mesh excision surgery.Block h11: block g2 report source has been corrected.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a pinnacle pelvic floor repair kits device was implanted into the patient during posterior pinnacle cervical suspension + repair of enterocele procedure performed on (b)(6), 2013 for the treatment of enterocele and vault descent.As reported by the patient's attorney, after the implantation, the patient experienced discomfort.It was not painful rather the sensation of a lump when sitting and lying.On examination, there was a posterior wall erosion and tenderness on the left posterior arm.Subsequently, the patient had revision surgery on november 2, 2018 for eua, cystoscopy, cystodistention, pr and rectal examination which found 0.5 x 1cm mesh exposure approx.3cm proximal to posterior fourchette.On (b)(6), 2019, the patient underwent revision surgery of excision of vaginal mesh including bilateral groin dissection, and diagnostic laparoscopy and division of adhesions.However, in view of extensive dissection and prolonged anesthetic, hysterectomy and repairs procedures could not be done.Findings showed deep pod, postoperative delirium redundant sigmoid, sigmoid colon loop adherent to anterior pelvic peritoneum where mesh can be appreciated - no fistulation into this sigmoid loop.No rectal involvement.During the procedure, mesh arm was densely adhered to periosteum and was dissected off from the bladder.Body of mesh divided centrally.At this point, it was evident that the body of the mesh was "pulled over" towards the right vaginal wall with part of the body pulled into the arm tracts.Dissection of posterior compartment until mesh encountered 3cm proximal to introitus.Mesh dissected off the recto-vaginal septum.Remainder of the body of mesh dissected laterally.Right arm dissected to the level of sacrospinous ligament, short arm due to displaced body.Unable to dislodge mesh arm from right sacrospinous ligament, therefore arm divided at the level of sacrospinous ligament.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PINNACLE PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR KITS
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
FREUDENBERG MEDICAL MIS INC
2301 centennial boulevard
jeffersonville IN 47130
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key11175538
MDR Text Key227052775
Report Number3005099803-2021-00112
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OTP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K071957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2014
Device Model NumberM0068317100
Device Catalogue Number831-710
Device Lot NumberML00000247
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/16/2020
Initial Date FDA Received01/14/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/14/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-