|
Model Number APB-2-6-HX-ES |
Device Problems
Stretched (1601); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 12/29/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received a report that the first two coils (3*2, 2*8) were successfully filled into the aneurysm.During the filling of the third colil (2*6) the coil was stretched, and a stent was used to assist to make the coil go against the wall.The coil was implanted at the intended location, there was no medical or surgical intervention, and the pushwire was not damaged.There was no friction or difficulty during delivery noted, no detachment attempts were made, repositioning was performed three times, rotation was performed, and a continuous flush was administered.It was indicated that all devices were prepared as per the instructions for use (ifu), and no patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of an amorphous, ruptured aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery (mca) with a max d iameter of 6 mm and a 3 mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was moderate.Ancillary devices include a termao sheath, johnson & johnson guidecatheter, medtronic microcatheter.Additional information received from the physician indicated that the coil was stretched.Then when it was prepared to be withdrawn it from the body, it detached.The implantation stayed in the body and could not be removed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received indicated the blood vessel was not considered to be curved, and the microcatheter had tension during the embolization which led to the premature detachment.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received indicated the cause of the coil premature detachment was determined, but no clarification was received at this time.Halfway in the embolization, the coil was detached and left in the blood vessel.Later, the surgeon used the ab stent to stick the coil to the wall of the blood vessel.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|