• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMÉRIEUX SA VITEK MS INSTRUMENT; VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMÉRIEUX SA VITEK MS INSTRUMENT; VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 410895
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer from (b)(6) notified biomérieux of an organism misidentification using vitek® ms (ref.410895, s/n: (b)(4) in conjunction with knowledge base (kb) version (b)(4).The customer had a green colony cultured on tsab (thermofisher).The strain has been characterized as oxidase positive.The bacterial strain was sourced from a stool sample from an adult male, (b)(6), hospitalized for diarrhea.The green colony was analyzed on vitek® ms instrument.The result was vibrio alginolyticus with 99.9% confidence.This identification was reported to physician.The green colony was then subcultured on tcsb at 35°c overnight.Small colonies became visible, still oxidase positive.Xld medium was also inoculated for two (2) days from the original sample.Colonies from tsab, tcsb and xld media were tested on vitek® ms.The result was vibrio parahemolyticus with 99.9% confidence.In parallel, a vitek® 2 gn id card was tested with colonies from the tsab medium.The result was vibrio parahemolyticus at 99.9% confidence.In summary: initial vitek® ms testing: vibrio alginolyticus.Repeat vitek® ms testing with colonies from three (3) different plate media: vibrio parahemolyticus.Alternate method, vitek® 2 gn id card: vibrio parahemolyticus.There is no reported harm to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A customer in singapore notified biomérieux of obtaining a misidentification of vibrio parahaemolyticus as vibrio alginolyicus in association with their vitek® ms instrument (ref.(b)(4); serial# (b)(6)).The first test ((b)(6) 2021) gave a single choice result of v.Alginolyticus.The second test ((b)(6) 2021) gave three (3) results of v.Parahaemolyticus.Oxidase testing and results using vitek 2 gn id card also suggested an identification of v.Parahaemolyticus.Investigation: fine tuning: according to vilink alert tool criteria, no fine-tuning was needed during the tests made on (b)(6) 2021.Spot preparation quality: the customer¿s spot preparation quality was not optimal.The calibrator and sample ¿all peaks¿ values were heterogeneous (between 75 and 121).Optimal preparation should yield homogeneous values.Further, the v.Alginolyticus result was obtained with a low identification score (-0.30) which is near the acceptable limit for giving an identification result or a ¿no identification¿ result (-0.4).Knowledge base (kb) review: the expected identification remains unknown as it was not confirmed using a reference method.Based on oxidase and vitek 2 tests, the most probable identification is v.Parahaemolyticus which is present in the customer¿s knowledge base version (v3.2).Sample data analysis: the spectra leading to the v.Alginolyticus result displays a mass shift.The mass shift was not the same over all the spectra, suggesting non-optimal spot preparation quality.For this result, the maximum resolution at 348 was non-optimal.With sub-optimal resolution, the algorithm has difficulties defining the exact position of the peaks (masses) and they may appear shifted.The three (3) sets of spectra leading to the v.Parahaemolyticus result, had maximum resolutions between 750 and 800 (correct value).Analysis of calibrator spectra linked to the samples show the peak intensities acquired during the first reading of the calibrator spot were very low compared to the second reading, also suggesting non-optimal calibrator spot preparation.Root cause: based on the findings above, root cause was determined to be non-optimal spot preparation.It was recommended that local customer service check sample preparation with the customer and provide customer training materials to improve their spot preparation technique.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK MS INSTRUMENT
Type of Device
VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMÉRIEUX SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR  38390
MDR Report Key11233010
MDR Text Key240970751
Report Number9615754-2021-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QBN
UDI-Device Identifier03573026359119
UDI-Public03573026359119
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K181412
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number410895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/08/2021
Initial Date FDA Received01/26/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/19/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/16/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age40 YR
-
-