• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP INC PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP INC PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM; REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS Back to Search Results
Model Number 8360-10
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 12/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If additional information or investigation results become available, a supplement will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an intraoperative issue with a prestige grasper.During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure, the jaws of the device broke into 2 pieces and fell inside the patient's abdomen.The first fragment was easily removed using another grasper.The second piece was more difficult and a laparoscopic retrieval bag was required.All fragments were successfully removed and there was no further patient harm.An intervention was required.There was a slight surgical delay.Additional information had been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updates: d9 product receipt date: the device was returned to the manufacturer and evaluated at tek park for distal tip separation.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was not able to be conducted by the manufacturer as no lot # was provided by the complainant.However, all device history records (dhr) are reviewed and released according to documented procedures and a device is not released if it does not meet requirements or is nonconforming.Additionally, historical scrap rates were reviewed with no increase observed in scrap related to the complaint issue.Previous investigations performed against devices returned with distal braze failures identified improvement opportunities following a review of the tube sub assembly test procedure work instruction (wi), the brazing procedure wi, and the brazed joint buffing wi.While the tube subassembly joint is 100% percent tested with a torsional force, there was no requirement for applying a bending force to the joint.Therefore, a manual bend test was added to the wi.Additionally, a review of the torque test fixture and accompanying wi, noted the potential for the tube to slip inside the collet during inspections allowing for a defective part to potentially pass this test.The tube sub assembly test procedure was further updated to note this potential failure mode and to define the process for cleaning the parts and fixture/collet with alcohol prior to use.A review of the brazing procedure wi revealed that the glass tube was too short to effectively seal the brazing area off from the surrounding environment.Without a proper seal the brazing area could have insufficient argon present to facilitate effective brazing.The brazing procedure wi was updated to include a check for this condition prior to brazing.Additionally, the supplier updated the wi to optimize the order of operations of when flux is applied, the soldering ring is assembled, and the tube is loaded.This change ensured that flux would be present throughout the entire joint space and allow for proper solder travel.Furthermore, a functional review and visual examination of the nest, which the tube sub assembly sits into, was performed.This review revealed that the two argon access holes were clogged.Therefore, the associated preventative maintenance activities were updated to monitor the access holes and prevent a recurrence of buildup.Finally, the supplier updated the brazed joint buffing wi to note the potential failure mode of excessive buffing, which could remove too much material and weaken the joint.The visual inspection at tek park noted nicks, scratches and defects; upper and lower jaw disassembled from the jaw assembly.Orange tape had been applied to the instrument handle.The button which connects the thumb loop and finger loop is damaged and is seated unevenly in its mating hole.Laser markings were faded and masked which suggested that this instrument was repaired.Functional testing revealed instrument function was not smooth and consistent.The complained failure of the device was confirmed.Based on prior evaluations of complaint devices reported with a failure mode of distal braze break/separation, this event likely occurred due to inadequacies in the defined production process which limited the device performance.Aesculap inc.Opened a corrective action/preventive action (capa) for further evaluation of the design transfer of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESTIGE ATRA GRASPER DBL-ACT 5MM
Type of Device
REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP INC
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP INC
3773 corporate parkway
center valley PA 18034
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan severino
3773 corporate parkway
center valley, PA 18034
MDR Report Key11253665
MDR Text Key231121349
Report Number2916714-2021-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NWV
UDI-Device Identifier04046955083374
UDI-Public4046955083374
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number8360-10
Device Catalogue Number8360-10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/17/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/04/2021
Initial Date FDA Received01/29/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/22/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-