• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GLAXOSMITHKLINE DUNGARVAN LTD NEW POLIGRIP SA; DENTURE ADHESIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GLAXOSMITHKLINE DUNGARVAN LTD NEW POLIGRIP SA; DENTURE ADHESIVE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 01/21/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Argus case id: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Hospitalisation [hospitalisation], device use error [device use error].Case description: this case was reported by a dentist via call center representative and described the occurrence of hospitalisation in a male patient who received double salt dental adhesive cream (new poligrip sa) cream for an unknown indication.Concurrent medical conditions included denture wearer and living in care.On an unknown date, the patient started new poligrip sa.On (b)(6) 2021, an unknown time after starting new poligrip sa, the patient experienced hospitalisation (serious criteria hospitalization).On an unknown date, the patient experienced device use error.On an unknown date, the outcome of the hospitalisation and device use error were unknown.It was unknown if the reporter considered the hospitalisation and device use error to be related to new poligrip sa.This report is made by gsk without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences.[clinical course] on an unknown date, the patient (reporter's father) with long-term care level 5 was wearing full dentures and using poligrip with green package (probably new poligrip sa).The patient had used a relatively much amount and the cream became sloppy while eating food because the patient did not follow the usage of new poligrip sa.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was admitted to a hospital.A physician told to stop using new poligrip sa during hospitalization because it might cause aspiration pneumonia.Follow-up information received from the reporting dentist via sales rep on 22 january 2021 [clinical course], patient: male in his 80s, as of (b)(6) 2021, the reporter was considering if new poligrip sa should be continued.Follow-up information received from the reporting dentist via sales rep on 25 january 2021 suspect product: double salt dental adhesive cream (new poligrip sa) cream for denture wearer on (b)(6) 2021, a physician told to stop using new poligrip sa during hospitalization because it might cause aspiration pneumonia.The reporter (dentist) had not heard of such an event.On (b)(6) 2021, a hospital staff stopped using new poligrip sa.The reporter wanted to continue using new poligrip sa in terms of mastication and articulation.On (b)(6) 2021, the reporter called twice.The hospital told that using new poligrip sa to the patient (reporter's father) would be accepted if a nurse could give an instruction when using it or the reporter could perform tissue conditioning.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEW POLIGRIP SA
Type of Device
DENTURE ADHESIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
GLAXOSMITHKLINE DUNGARVAN LTD
dungarvan, waterford
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
po box 13398
research triangle park, NC 27709
8888255249
MDR Report Key11257665
MDR Text Key233088816
Report Number3003721894-2021-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KOT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/22/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/01/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age90 YR
-
-