• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX; CENTRAL STATION MONITOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX; CENTRAL STATION MONITOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 866389
Device Problem Device Alarm System (1012)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Death (1802)
Event Date 11/16/2020
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
A philips clinical specialist (cs) went to the customer site on (b)(6) 2020, and the customer biomedical engineer (biomed) stated that the ecg leads off alarm had been red prior to upgrades performed in (b)(6) of 2020.Due to the unit being full with covid-19 patients, the monitor was not accessible to see what the current alarm was sent.The alarm review was checked and a yellow alarm was triggered.The hospital only had red alarms sent to the nurses phones.The pic ix configuration was changed to page out the yellow ecg leads off alarm.Both biomed and nursing were in agreement with this process until the replacement monitors were to be ordered in the first quarter of 2021.On (b)(6) 2020, the cs received a phone call from the biomed requesting that the cs speak with the risk manager regarding an rca that they were doing on the patient , as the patient had subsequently expired.The rca team was requesting information regarding how alarms are set and how they paged to the nurses.The director of critical care stated that they had some rooms closed so that philips could go in and look at the monitors.The cs did pull up the configuration both pre and post upgrade; both configurations did have the alarm as "red".The cs questioned if the wrong configuration was pushed into the monitor.On (b)(6) 2020, the cs went to the hospital imc unit to look at the monitors in the empty rooms.The correct configuration was in the monitors.It was discovered that the default profile was profile adult; the correct profile should have been imc adult.The profile that defaulted did not have all ecg leads off as a red alarm; therefore, did not send the alarm to the phone.It was set as a yellow alarm and it did respond as anticipated-alarmed yellow at the philips information center ix (pic ix), but did not go to the phone.When the cs created the configuration, the cs failed to change the default to imc adult.The cs was not onsite when they were upgraded; therefore, did not catch the mistake.
 
Event Description
The customer provided feedback that on (b)(6) 2020, an "ecg leads off" alarm was not paged to the nurse and a patient was found in cardiac arrest.The patient was resuscitated, however, a philips clinical specialist (cs) was informed on (b)(6) 2020 that the patient later expired.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
CENTRAL STATION MONITOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
Manufacturer Contact
robert corning
3000 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
9786871501
MDR Report Key11266611
MDR Text Key229871031
Report Number1218950-2021-00708
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier00884838086715
UDI-Public(01)00884838086715
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K102495
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/28/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866389
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/16/2020
Initial Date FDA Received02/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/15/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-