Reporter is a j&j employee.Visual inspection of the complaint device identifies that the connecting thread is damaged.No dimensional inspection performed due to post manufacturing damage.Drawing/specification review: following drawings were reviewed: extraction screw.Overall complaint confirmed? no.Conclusion: the complaint condition is not confirmed.During the investigation no unidentified product design/manufacturing issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot, part: 03.010.446.Lot: f-12432 manufacturing site: (b)(4).Supplier: (b)(4).Release to warehouse date: june 27, 2011.Due to the age of more than 9 years of this device a wear or use related root cause is the most likely reason of the complained malfunction.Per franchise complaint product investigation procedure (b)(4) is for complaints for which a non-manufacturing related probable cause has been identified no mre review required.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|