• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO BIO-MEDICUS LIFE SUPPORT TM; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO BIO-MEDICUS LIFE SUPPORT TM; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number LS96218-021
Device Problem Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Date 01/12/2021
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use, the customer stated that following re-tightening of the attachment point of the bio-medicus arterial jugular cannula after 15 days of use and insertion in the patient, that the cannula sheared across the metal frame of the device.This cannula which has a silicone ring present on the device was used to attach a suture close to the insertion point to fix the cannula.The customer explained that they actually used two attachment points for the cannula.A knot was made on the part the cannula at the point of insertion (silicone ring), but also at a point at a distance of about 5 then 10cm away to secure fixation of the cannula.This additional attachment point was necessary due to mobilization of the patient.In this case, it was necessary to replace the additional suture fixation, as it had been in place for 15 days and had become too loose.A knot was therefore made on the jugular cannula.The customer said the suture was passed twice around part of the cannula, and probably damaged (cut through) the cannula.A thin stream of blood occurred and then a significant hemorrhage appeared.The cannula had sectioned.The patient, already hemodynamically very unstable and impossible to ventilate, died as a result of hemorrhagic shock (blood loss) caused by the sectioning of the cannula.Patient was overweight, covid+ and had been receiving treatment for high blood pressure.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use, the customer stated that following re-tightening of the attachment point of the bio-medicus arterial jugular cannula after 15 days of use and insertion in the patient, that the cannula sheared across the metal frame of the device.This cannula which has a silicone ring present on the device was used to attach a suture close to the insertion point to fix the cannula.The customer explained that they actually used two attachment points for the cannula.A knot was made on the part the cannula at the point of insertion (silicone ring), but also at a point at a distance of about 5 then 10cm away to secure fixation of the cannula.This additional attachment point was necessary due to mobilization of the patient.In this case, it was necessary to replace the additional suture fixation, as it had been in place for 15 days and had become too loose.A knot was therefore made on the jugular cannula.The customer said the suture was passed twice around part of the cannula, and probably damaged (cut through) the cannula.A thin stream of blood occurred and then a significant hemorrhage appeared.The cannula had sectioned.The patient, already hemodynamically very unstable and impossible to ventilate, died as a result of hemorrhagic shock (blood loss) caused by the sectioning of the cannula.Patient was overweight, covid+ and had been receiving treatment for high blood pressure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic investigation: analysis of the returned complaint cannula found the suture ring still in place along with a suture.A medtronic technician and r / d engineer were able to estimate which side of the catheter was against the patients neck with the opposite side being exposed to the secondary suture.This seems to support a relatively clean ¿cut¿ likely due to suture strangulation on one side of the body and tearing of catheter material with the spring cut on the opposite side when the product was removed from the patient.There is no evidence of manufacturing defects in the product (adjacent walls appear normal and fully formed).Based on what medtronic was able to observe, after 15 days the loose secondary anchoring suture was tightened and that this tightening resulted in a breach of the cannula wall while on pump.In a vv procedure, this catheter would be returning blood to the patient.Breaching the wall would result in loss of blood through the opening.After analysis this complaint was determined to a use-related issue; according to the instructions for use, adverse effects like major blood loss or death could be associated with the use of the product due to an incorrect suturing.Review of the device history record found no abnormalities during manufacturing that would cause or contribute to the reported event.A review of complaints received for similar model numbers found no similar occurrences.Assessment against the medtronic risk management file document indicates that the current risk zone does not exceed the risk zone predicted; therefore, no capa will be initiated at this time.This investigation was completed with the information that was provided.If additional information is received, this investigation will be reopened if deemed necessary.Medtronic will continue to monitor for future occurrences and trends.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIO-MEDICUS LIFE SUPPORT TM
Type of Device
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
MDR Report Key11284369
MDR Text Key230425506
Report Number9612164-2021-00518
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
UNDER REVIEW
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/25/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/14/2023
Device Model NumberLS96218-021
Device Catalogue NumberLS96218-021
Device Lot Number220948011
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2021
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/26/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/05/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/15/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/25/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight125
-
-