Additional narrative: this report is for an unknown implant.Part and lot number are unknown.Without the specific part number; the udi number, 510-k number and manufacturing site name are unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
This file is a review of the following journal article: aguado, g., et al (2019) retears of the rotator cuff an ultrasonographic assessment during the first postoperative year.The orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, vol.7, pages 1-6 (colombia).The study emphasizes on the prevalence of recurrent ruptures after a rotator cuff repair.The patients evaluated on course of this study: 90 adult patients.The article describes the following procedure: arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.The device involved was: unknown healix anchors.Complications described: a total of 23 patients (25.5%) had re-tears: 13 complete and 10 partial.A copy of this literature article is attached to this medwatch report.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary =the complaint device is not being returned; the availability of the device is unknown, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.With the information provided, and without the complaint device to evaluate, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.Since no lot number was provided, a manufacturing record evaluation or sterile load review could not be conducted.If any additional information is obtained, this complaint will be re-opened to capture that information.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|