• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); No Information (3190); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 08/07/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
510(k) number: k163468.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Ratone et al 2020 outcomes of duodenal stenting: experience in a french tertiary center with 220 cases a retrospective single-center study was performed using data collected from all patients who received palliative duodenal semss between january 2011 and december 2016.A 0.035-inch guidewire ((b)(4)) was used to traverse the stricture under fluoroscopic guidance, and the stent was then positioned across the stricture and deployed.The length and number of semss were selected by the endoscopist during the procedure.All stents were uncovered.The following uncovered semss were used during the five years of the study: cook evolutiontm (b)(4) 9 and 12.187 cook evolutiontm devices used.The duodenal reintervention rates during the first three months were 28% (23/81) 41 cases of re-intervention after duodenal stent placement up to 30 months.
 
Event Description
Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) #: k163468.Device evaluation: the duodenal devices involved in this complaint was not returned to cirl for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation will be complete.This file was created from the attached journal article.Reference "ratone et al 2020".Complaint files pr (b)(4) were opened as a result of this paper.This file pr (b)(4) was opened to investigate reintervention.Documents review including ifu review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution evo duodenal devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.As the evo duodenal devices from unknown lot number, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed the patient¿s pre-existing condition.From the information provided it is known that the patient had symptomatic malignant gastroduodenal outlet obstruction.As per medical advisor "reintervention was likely due to patient¿s underlying pathology" summary: complaint is confirmed based on the customers testimony.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
510(k) number: k163468.Device evaluation: the duodenal devices involved in this complaint was not returned to cirl for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation will be complete.This file was created from the = journal article."ratone et al 2020".Complaint files (b)(4), (b)(4), (b)(4), (b)(4), (b)(4) and (b)(4) were opened as a result of this paper.This file (b)(4) was opened to investigate reintervention.Lab evaluation: n/a.Documents review including ifu review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution evo duodenal devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.As the evo duodenal devices from unknown lot number, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.There is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review: n/a root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed the patient¿s pre-existing condition.From the information provided it is known that the patient had symptomatic malignant gastroduodenal outlet obstruction.As per medical advisor "reintervention was likely due to patient¿s underlying pathology" summary: complaint is confirmed based on the customers testimony.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to an update to annex e code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key11313370
MDR Text Key238606515
Report Number3001845648-2021-00088
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/07/2019
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/13/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/11/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/13/2021
01/13/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/24/2021
01/31/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-